i5-10400 vs i3-12300 - Minecraft RTX 4080 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-10400 i3-12300

Multi-Thread Performance

12716 Pts
14493 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2609 Pts
3550 Pts

Minecraft

i5-10400 vs i3-12300 in Minecraft using RTX 4080 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-10400 i3-12300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
1,753.9 FPS
1080p
1,737.9 FPS
1440p
831.3 FPS
1440p
823.7 FPS
2160p
433.2 FPS
2160p
429.3 FPS
w1440p
676.5 FPS
w1440p
670.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
1,507.5 FPS
1080p
1,497.8 FPS
1440p
869.7 FPS
1440p
863.6 FPS
2160p
523.8 FPS
2160p
520.1 FPS
w1440p
742.6 FPS
w1440p
737.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
1,261.2 FPS
1080p
1,257.7 FPS
1440p
908.1 FPS
1440p
903.6 FPS
2160p
614.4 FPS
2160p
610.8 FPS
w1440p
808.7 FPS
w1440p
804.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
768.5 FPS
1080p
777.4 FPS
1440p
984.9 FPS
1440p
983.5 FPS
2160p
795.6 FPS
2160p
792.3 FPS
w1440p
940.9 FPS
w1440p
938.5 FPS
i5-10400
  • The i5-10400 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-10400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-10400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-10400 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12300 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i5-10400 vs i3-12300 specifications

i5-10400 vs i3-12300 Architecture

i5-10400 i3-12300
CodenameComet LakeAlder Lake-S
GenerationCore i5 (Comet Lake)Core i3 (Alder Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Part#unknownSRL61
Production StatusActiveActive

i5-10400 vs i3-12300 Cache

i5-10400 i3-12300
Cache L164K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)1.25MB (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)12MB (shared)

i5-10400 vs i3-12300 Cores

i5-10400 i3-12300
# of Cores64
# of Threads128
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 630UHD Graphics 730
SMP # CPUs11

i5-10400 vs i3-12300 Features

i5-10400 i3-12300

i5-10400 vs i3-12300 Notes

i5-10400 i3-12300

i5-10400 vs i3-12300 Performance

i5-10400 i3-12300
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency2.9 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier29.0x35.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W60 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzup to 4.4 GHz

i5-10400 vs i3-12300 Physical

i5-10400 i3-12300
Die Sizeunknown163 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1700

Compare i5-10400 vs i3-12300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments