i3-9320 vs i5-11600K - Minecraft Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9320 i5-11600K

Multi-Thread Performance

10144 Pts
14700 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2552 Pts
2992 Pts

Minecraft

i3-9320 vs i5-11600K in Minecraft using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9320 i5-11600K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
481.3 FPS
1080p
535.6 FPS
1440p
222.4 FPS
1440p
247.5 FPS
2160p
111.2 FPS
2160p
123.7 FPS
w1440p
178.5 FPS
w1440p
198.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
569.3 FPS
1080p
619.2 FPS
1440p
306.0 FPS
1440p
333.9 FPS
2160p
172.3 FPS
2160p
188.3 FPS
w1440p
255.4 FPS
w1440p
278.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
657.3 FPS
1080p
702.8 FPS
1440p
389.6 FPS
1440p
420.3 FPS
2160p
233.3 FPS
2160p
253.0 FPS
w1440p
332.3 FPS
w1440p
359.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
833.3 FPS
1080p
870.0 FPS
1440p
556.7 FPS
1440p
593.1 FPS
2160p
355.4 FPS
2160p
382.2 FPS
w1440p
486.1 FPS
w1440p
519.6 FPS
i3-9320
  • The i3-9320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-9320 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i5-11600K
  • The i5-11600K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-11600K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-11600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-11600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-11600K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i3-9320 vs i5-11600K specifications

i3-9320 vs i5-11600K Architecture

i3-9320 i5-11600K
CodenameCoffee LakeRocket Lake
GenerationCore i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Core i5 (Rocket Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#unknownunknown
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedApr 2019Mar 16th, 2021

i3-9320 vs i5-11600K Cache

i3-9320 i5-11600K
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L36MB (shared)12MB (shared)

i3-9320 vs i5-11600K Cores

i3-9320 i5-11600K
# of Cores46
# of Threads412
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630UHD Graphics 750
SMP # CPUs11

i3-9320 vs i5-11600K Performance

i3-9320 i5-11600K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.9 GHz
Multiplier37.0x39.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP62 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzup to 4.9 GHz
Voltagevariablevariable

i3-9320 vs i5-11600K Physical

i3-9320 i5-11600K
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA1200
Process Size14 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1200
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i3-9320 vs i5-11600K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments