i3-12300 vs Core2 Quad Q9550 - Minecraft Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 Core2 Quad Q9550

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
3974 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
1196 Pts

Minecraft

i3-12300 vs Core2 Quad Q9550 in Minecraft using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 Core2 Quad Q9550

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
412.5 FPS
1080p
184.5 FPS
1440p
190.2 FPS
1440p
85.0 FPS
2160p
93.4 FPS
2160p
41.8 FPS
w1440p
151.7 FPS
w1440p
67.8 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
503.8 FPS
1080p
262.5 FPS
1440p
269.1 FPS
1440p
137.4 FPS
2160p
148.8 FPS
2160p
75.0 FPS
w1440p
223.2 FPS
w1440p
113.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
595.1 FPS
1080p
340.4 FPS
1440p
348.0 FPS
1440p
189.8 FPS
2160p
204.1 FPS
2160p
108.2 FPS
w1440p
294.7 FPS
w1440p
159.0 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
777.8 FPS
1080p
496.3 FPS
1440p
505.9 FPS
1440p
294.5 FPS
2160p
314.8 FPS
2160p
174.5 FPS
w1440p
437.8 FPS
w1440p
250.3 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12300 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Core2 Quad Q9550
  • The Core2 Quad Q9550 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM

Compare i3-12300 vs Core2 Quad Q9550 specifications

i3-12300 vs Core2 Quad Q9550 Architecture

i3-12300 Core2 Quad Q9550
CodenameAlder Lake-SYorkfield
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core 2 Quad (Yorkfield)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Part#SRL61SLAWQSLB8V
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i3-12300 vs Core2 Quad Q9550 Cache

i3-12300 Core2 Quad Q9550
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)12MB (shared)

i3-12300 vs Core2 Quad Q9550 Cores

i3-12300 Core2 Quad Q9550
# of Cores44
# of Threads84
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12300 vs Core2 Quad Q9550 Performance

i3-12300 Core2 Quad Q9550
Base Clock100 MHz333 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz2.833 GHz
Multiplier35.0x8.5x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzN/A

i3-12300 vs Core2 Quad Q9550 Physical

i3-12300 Core2 Quad Q9550
Die Size163 mm²2x 107 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA6
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 775

Compare i3-12300 vs Core2 Quad Q9550 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments