i3-12300 vs i9-12900K - Minecraft GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 i9-12900K

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
28791 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
3903 Pts

Minecraft

i3-12300 vs i9-12900K in Minecraft using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 i9-12900K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
397.2 FPS
1080p
432.4 FPS
1440p
183.6 FPS
1440p
195.1 FPS
2160p
92.1 FPS
2160p
97.9 FPS
w1440p
147.5 FPS
w1440p
156.7 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
488.9 FPS
1080p
523.0 FPS
1440p
261.4 FPS
1440p
274.8 FPS
2160p
147.0 FPS
2160p
154.8 FPS
w1440p
218.1 FPS
w1440p
229.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
580.6 FPS
1080p
613.7 FPS
1440p
339.2 FPS
1440p
354.5 FPS
2160p
201.9 FPS
2160p
211.7 FPS
w1440p
288.7 FPS
w1440p
301.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
763.9 FPS
1080p
794.9 FPS
1440p
494.8 FPS
1440p
513.9 FPS
2160p
311.7 FPS
2160p
325.4 FPS
w1440p
429.8 FPS
w1440p
447.1 FPS
i3-12300
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i9-12900K
  • The i9-12900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i9-12900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-12900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-12900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.

Compare i3-12300 vs i9-12900K specifications

i3-12300 vs i9-12900K Architecture

i3-12300 i9-12900K
CodenameAlder Lake-SAlder Lake
ECC MemoryNoNo
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i9 (Alder Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4-3200 MHz Dual-channel
PCI-ExpressGen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only)Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only)
Part#SRL61unknown
Production StatusActiveActive
Release DateJan 2022Nov 4th, 2021

i3-12300 vs i9-12900K Cache

i3-12300 i9-12900K
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)14MB (shared)
Cache L312MB (shared)30MB (shared)

i3-12300 vs i9-12900K Cores

i3-12300 i9-12900K
# of Cores416
# of Threads824
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730UHD Graphics 770
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12300 vs i9-12900K Performance

i3-12300 i9-12900K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier35.0x32.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP60 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzup to 5.2 GHz

i3-12300 vs i9-12900K Physical

i3-12300 i9-12900K
Die Size163 mm²unknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA1700
Process Size10 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1700
tJMax100°C100°C

Compare i3-12300 vs i9-12900K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments