i3-12300 vs i3-2130 - Minecraft Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 i3-2130

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
4059 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
1754 Pts

Minecraft

i3-12300 vs i3-2130 in Minecraft using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 i3-2130

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
412.5 FPS
1080p
193.5 FPS
1440p
190.2 FPS
1440p
89.2 FPS
2160p
93.4 FPS
2160p
43.8 FPS
w1440p
151.7 FPS
w1440p
71.1 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
503.8 FPS
1080p
273.0 FPS
1440p
269.1 FPS
1440p
143.1 FPS
2160p
148.8 FPS
2160p
78.1 FPS
w1440p
223.2 FPS
w1440p
118.1 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
595.1 FPS
1080p
352.4 FPS
1440p
348.0 FPS
1440p
197.0 FPS
2160p
204.1 FPS
2160p
112.3 FPS
w1440p
294.7 FPS
w1440p
165.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
777.8 FPS
1080p
511.3 FPS
1440p
505.9 FPS
1440p
304.8 FPS
2160p
314.8 FPS
2160p
180.8 FPS
w1440p
437.8 FPS
w1440p
259.1 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12300 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12300 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12300 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-2130
  • The i3-2130 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-2130 specifications

i3-12300 vs i3-2130 Architecture

i3-12300 i3-2130
CodenameAlder Lake-SSandy Bridge
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i3 (Sandy Bridge)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRL61SR05W
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i3-12300 vs i3-2130 Cache

i3-12300 i3-2130
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)3MB (shared)

i3-12300 vs i3-2130 Cores

i3-12300 i3-2130
# of Cores42
# of Threads84
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730Intel HD 2000
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12300 vs i3-2130 Performance

i3-12300 i3-2130
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier35.0x34.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzN/A

i3-12300 vs i3-2130 Physical

i3-12300 i3-2130
Die Size163 mm²131 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA10
Process Size10 nm32 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1155

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-2130 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments