i3-12300 vs Phenom II X3 710 - Minecraft RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 Phenom II X3 710

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
2442 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
907 Pts

Minecraft

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X3 710 in Minecraft using RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 Phenom II X3 710

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
1,309.9 FPS
1080p
497.2 FPS
1440p
612.8 FPS
1440p
232.6 FPS
2160p
313.4 FPS
2160p
119.0 FPS
w1440p
495.5 FPS
w1440p
188.1 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
1,221.5 FPS
1080p
584.1 FPS
1440p
687.8 FPS
1440p
317.4 FPS
2160p
404.3 FPS
2160p
182.3 FPS
w1440p
582.5 FPS
w1440p
266.7 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
1,133.1 FPS
1080p
670.9 FPS
1440p
762.8 FPS
1440p
402.2 FPS
2160p
495.2 FPS
2160p
245.7 FPS
w1440p
669.5 FPS
w1440p
345.2 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
956.3 FPS
1080p
844.6 FPS
1440p
912.9 FPS
1440p
571.8 FPS
2160p
677.0 FPS
2160p
372.3 FPS
w1440p
843.4 FPS
w1440p
502.4 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12300 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12300 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12300 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Phenom II X3 710
  • The Phenom II X3 710 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM

Compare i3-12300 vs Phenom II X3 710 specifications

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X3 710 Architecture

i3-12300 Phenom II X3 710
CodenameAlder Lake-SHeka
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Phenom II X3 (Heka)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRL61HDX710WFK3DGIHDX710WFGIBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X3 710 Cache

i3-12300 Phenom II X3 710
Cache L180K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)6MB (shared)

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X3 710 Cores

i3-12300 Phenom II X3 710
# of Cores43
# of Threads83
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X3 710 Performance

i3-12300 Phenom II X3 710
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz2.6 GHz
Multiplier35.0x13.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzN/A

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X3 710 Physical

i3-12300 Phenom II X3 710
Die Size163 mm²258 mm²
PackageFC-LGA16AµPGA
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM3

Compare i3-12300 vs Phenom II X3 710 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments