i9-10900K vs i3-11300 - Microsoft Flight Simulator GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K i3-11300

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
12078 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
2959 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i9-10900K vs i3-11300 in Microsoft Flight Simulator using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K i3-11300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
13.6 FPS
1080p
12.8 FPS
1440p
11.9 FPS
1440p
11.2 FPS
2160p
9.4 FPS
2160p
8.8 FPS
w1440p
11.4 FPS
w1440p
10.7 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
28.2 FPS
1080p
26.7 FPS
1440p
25.1 FPS
1440p
23.8 FPS
2160p
20.4 FPS
2160p
19.2 FPS
w1440p
24.2 FPS
w1440p
22.8 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
42.8 FPS
1080p
40.7 FPS
1440p
38.3 FPS
1440p
36.4 FPS
2160p
31.3 FPS
2160p
29.6 FPS
w1440p
36.9 FPS
w1440p
35.0 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
72.0 FPS
1080p
68.6 FPS
1440p
64.6 FPS
1440p
61.5 FPS
2160p
53.3 FPS
2160p
50.5 FPS
w1440p
62.4 FPS
w1440p
59.3 FPS
i9-10900K
    i3-11300
    • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

    Compare i9-10900K vs i3-11300 specifications

    i9-10900K vs i3-11300 Architecture

    i9-10900K i3-11300

    i9-10900K vs i3-11300 Cache

    i9-10900K i3-11300

    i9-10900K vs i3-11300 Cores

    i9-10900K i3-11300

    i9-10900K vs i3-11300 Features

    i9-10900K i3-11300

    i9-10900K vs i3-11300 Notes

    i9-10900K i3-11300

    i9-10900K vs i3-11300 Performance

    i9-10900K i3-11300
    Frequency3.7 GHz3.90 GHz

    i9-10900K vs i3-11300 Physical

    i9-10900K i3-11300

    Compare i9-10900K vs i3-11300 in more games


    Discussion and Comments

    Share Your Comments