i9-10900K vs i3-10100 - Microsoft Flight Simulator Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
2531 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i9-10900K vs i3-10100 in Microsoft Flight Simulator using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
20.3 FPS
1080p
18.3 FPS
1440p
17.7 FPS
1440p
16.0 FPS
2160p
14.0 FPS
2160p
12.6 FPS
w1440p
17.0 FPS
w1440p
15.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
40.1 FPS
1080p
36.6 FPS
1440p
35.6 FPS
1440p
32.5 FPS
2160p
28.9 FPS
2160p
26.4 FPS
w1440p
34.3 FPS
w1440p
31.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
59.9 FPS
1080p
54.9 FPS
1440p
53.4 FPS
1440p
49.1 FPS
2160p
43.9 FPS
2160p
40.2 FPS
w1440p
51.6 FPS
w1440p
47.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
99.4 FPS
1080p
91.5 FPS
1440p
89.1 FPS
1440p
82.2 FPS
2160p
73.8 FPS
2160p
67.7 FPS
w1440p
86.3 FPS
w1440p
79.3 FPS
i9-10900K
    i3-10100
    • The i3-10100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

    Compare i9-10900K vs i3-10100 specifications

    i9-10900K vs i3-10100 Architecture

    i9-10900K i3-10100

    i9-10900K vs i3-10100 Cache

    i9-10900K i3-10100

    i9-10900K vs i3-10100 Cores

    i9-10900K i3-10100

    i9-10900K vs i3-10100 Features

    i9-10900K i3-10100

    i9-10900K vs i3-10100 Notes

    i9-10900K i3-10100

    i9-10900K vs i3-10100 Performance

    i9-10900K i3-10100
    Frequency3.7 GHz3.60 GHz
    TDP125 W65 W

    i9-10900K vs i3-10100 Physical

    i9-10900K i3-10100

    Compare i9-10900K vs i3-10100 in more games


    Discussion and Comments

    Share Your Comments