i5-13600K vs i3-10300 - Microsoft Flight Simulator GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-13600K i3-10300

Multi-Thread Performance

21168 Pts
10980 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

4308 Pts
2690 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i5-13600K vs i3-10300 in Microsoft Flight Simulator using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-13600K i3-10300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
14.5 FPS
1080p
12.5 FPS
1440p
12.2 FPS
1440p
11.0 FPS
2160p
9.6 FPS
2160p
8.7 FPS
w1440p
11.7 FPS
w1440p
10.5 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
29.8 FPS
1080p
26.2 FPS
1440p
25.6 FPS
1440p
23.4 FPS
2160p
20.8 FPS
2160p
19.0 FPS
w1440p
24.7 FPS
w1440p
22.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
45.2 FPS
1080p
39.9 FPS
1440p
39.1 FPS
1440p
35.8 FPS
2160p
31.9 FPS
2160p
29.3 FPS
w1440p
37.7 FPS
w1440p
34.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
75.9 FPS
1080p
67.3 FPS
1440p
66.0 FPS
1440p
60.6 FPS
2160p
54.2 FPS
2160p
50.0 FPS
w1440p
63.7 FPS
w1440p
58.3 FPS
i5-13600K
    i3-10300
    • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
    • The i3-10300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

    Compare i5-13600K vs i3-10300 specifications

    i5-13600K vs i3-10300 Architecture

    i5-13600K i3-10300

    i5-13600K vs i3-10300 Cache

    i5-13600K i3-10300

    i5-13600K vs i3-10300 Cores

    i5-13600K i3-10300

    i5-13600K vs i3-10300 Performance

    i5-13600K i3-10300
    Frequency3.5 GHz3.70 GHz
    TDP125 W65 W

    i5-13600K vs i3-10300 Physical

    i5-13600K i3-10300

    Compare i5-13600K vs i3-10300 in more games


    Discussion and Comments

    Share Your Comments