i5-13600K vs Phenom II X6 1075T - Microsoft Flight Simulator GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-13600K Phenom II X6 1075T

Multi-Thread Performance

21168 Pts
5344 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

4308 Pts
1193 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i5-13600K vs Phenom II X6 1075T in Microsoft Flight Simulator using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-13600K Phenom II X6 1075T

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
14.5 FPS
1080p
6.7 FPS
1440p
12.2 FPS
1440p
5.8 FPS
2160p
9.6 FPS
2160p
4.6 FPS
w1440p
11.7 FPS
w1440p
5.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
29.8 FPS
1080p
15.1 FPS
1440p
25.6 FPS
1440p
13.3 FPS
2160p
20.8 FPS
2160p
10.8 FPS
w1440p
24.7 FPS
w1440p
12.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
45.2 FPS
1080p
23.5 FPS
1440p
39.1 FPS
1440p
20.7 FPS
2160p
31.9 FPS
2160p
17.0 FPS
w1440p
37.7 FPS
w1440p
20.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
75.9 FPS
1080p
40.2 FPS
1440p
66.0 FPS
1440p
35.7 FPS
2160p
54.2 FPS
2160p
29.4 FPS
w1440p
63.7 FPS
w1440p
34.6 FPS
i5-13600K
  • The i5-13600K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-13600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-13600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-13600K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Phenom II X6 1075T
  • The Phenom II X6 1075T has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Phenom II X6 1075T has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i5-13600K vs Phenom II X6 1075T specifications

i5-13600K vs Phenom II X6 1075T Architecture

i5-13600K Phenom II X6 1075T
CodenameRaptor Lake-SThuban
GenerationCore i5 (Raptor Lake)Phenom II X6 (Thuban)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRMBDHDT75TFBK6DGRHDT75TFBGRBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i5-13600K vs Phenom II X6 1075T Cache

i5-13600K Phenom II X6 1075T
Cache L180K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L22MB (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L324MB (shared)6MB (shared)

i5-13600K vs Phenom II X6 1075T Cores

i5-13600K Phenom II X6 1075T
# of Cores146
# of Threads206
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i5-13600K vs Phenom II X6 1075T Performance

i5-13600K Phenom II X6 1075T
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier35.0x15.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.1 GHzup to 3.5 GHz

i5-13600K vs Phenom II X6 1075T Physical

i5-13600K Phenom II X6 1075T
Die Size257 mm²346 mm²
PackageFC-LGA16AµPGA
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM3
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i5-13600K vs Phenom II X6 1075T in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments