i5-11600K vs Phenom 8250e Triple-Core - Microsoft Flight Simulator Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-11600K Phenom 8250e Triple-Core

Multi-Thread Performance

14700 Pts
1619 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2992 Pts
620 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i5-11600K vs Phenom 8250e Triple-Core in Microsoft Flight Simulator using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-11600K Phenom 8250e Triple-Core

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
16.3 FPS
1080p
3.7 FPS
1440p
14.3 FPS
1440p
3.2 FPS
2160p
11.1 FPS
2160p
2.5 FPS
w1440p
13.6 FPS
w1440p
3.1 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
33.1 FPS
1080p
8.9 FPS
1440p
29.5 FPS
1440p
7.8 FPS
2160p
23.6 FPS
2160p
6.2 FPS
w1440p
28.2 FPS
w1440p
7.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
49.9 FPS
1080p
14.1 FPS
1440p
44.7 FPS
1440p
12.4 FPS
2160p
36.1 FPS
2160p
10.0 FPS
w1440p
42.8 FPS
w1440p
12.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
83.4 FPS
1080p
24.4 FPS
1440p
75.0 FPS
1440p
21.6 FPS
2160p
61.1 FPS
2160p
17.5 FPS
w1440p
72.0 FPS
w1440p
21.0 FPS
i5-11600K
    Phenom 8250e Triple-Core

      Compare i5-11600K vs Phenom 8250e Triple-Core specifications

      i5-11600K vs Phenom 8250e Triple-Core Architecture

      i5-11600K Phenom 8250e Triple-Core

      i5-11600K vs Phenom 8250e Triple-Core Cache

      i5-11600K Phenom 8250e Triple-Core

      i5-11600K vs Phenom 8250e Triple-Core Cores

      i5-11600K Phenom 8250e Triple-Core

      i5-11600K vs Phenom 8250e Triple-Core Features

      i5-11600K Phenom 8250e Triple-Core

      i5-11600K vs Phenom 8250e Triple-Core Notes

      i5-11600K Phenom 8250e Triple-Core

      i5-11600K vs Phenom 8250e Triple-Core Performance

      i5-11600K Phenom 8250e Triple-Core

      i5-11600K vs Phenom 8250e Triple-Core Physical

      i5-11600K Phenom 8250e Triple-Core

      Compare i5-11600K vs Phenom 8250e Triple-Core in more games


      Discussion and Comments

      Share Your Comments