i5-11400 vs i3-10100 - Microsoft Flight Simulator GTX 1650 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-11400 i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

14000 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2700 Pts
2531 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i5-11400 vs i3-10100 in Microsoft Flight Simulator using GTX 1650 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-11400 i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
11.9 FPS
1080p
11.0 FPS
1440p
10.4 FPS
1440p
9.6 FPS
2160p
8.2 FPS
2160p
7.6 FPS
w1440p
9.9 FPS
w1440p
9.2 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
25.1 FPS
1080p
23.4 FPS
1440p
22.3 FPS
1440p
20.8 FPS
2160p
18.0 FPS
2160p
16.9 FPS
w1440p
21.3 FPS
w1440p
20.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
38.3 FPS
1080p
35.8 FPS
1440p
34.1 FPS
1440p
31.9 FPS
2160p
27.9 FPS
2160p
26.1 FPS
w1440p
32.7 FPS
w1440p
30.8 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
64.6 FPS
1080p
60.6 FPS
1440p
57.9 FPS
1440p
54.2 FPS
2160p
47.6 FPS
2160p
44.7 FPS
w1440p
55.6 FPS
w1440p
52.3 FPS
i5-11400
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
i3-10100
  • The i3-10100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i5-11400 vs i3-10100 specifications

i5-11400 vs i3-10100 Architecture

i5-11400 i3-10100

i5-11400 vs i3-10100 Cache

i5-11400 i3-10100

i5-11400 vs i3-10100 Cores

i5-11400 i3-10100

i5-11400 vs i3-10100 Features

i5-11400 i3-10100

i5-11400 vs i3-10100 Notes

i5-11400 i3-10100

i5-11400 vs i3-10100 Performance

i5-11400 i3-10100
Frequency2.6 GHz3.60 GHz
TDP65 W65 W

i5-11400 vs i3-10100 Physical

i5-11400 i3-10100

Compare i5-11400 vs i3-10100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments