i5-10400 vs i5-13600K - Microsoft Flight Simulator Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-10400 i5-13600K

Multi-Thread Performance

12716 Pts
21168 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2609 Pts
4308 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i5-10400 vs i5-13600K in Microsoft Flight Simulator using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-10400 i5-13600K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
15.8 FPS
1080p
17.5 FPS
1440p
13.9 FPS
1440p
14.8 FPS
2160p
10.8 FPS
2160p
11.5 FPS
w1440p
13.2 FPS
w1440p
14.1 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
32.2 FPS
1080p
35.2 FPS
1440p
28.8 FPS
1440p
30.4 FPS
2160p
23.0 FPS
2160p
24.3 FPS
w1440p
27.5 FPS
w1440p
29.1 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
48.6 FPS
1080p
52.9 FPS
1440p
43.6 FPS
1440p
46.0 FPS
2160p
35.3 FPS
2160p
37.2 FPS
w1440p
41.8 FPS
w1440p
44.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
81.3 FPS
1080p
88.3 FPS
1440p
73.3 FPS
1440p
77.2 FPS
2160p
59.7 FPS
2160p
62.9 FPS
w1440p
70.3 FPS
w1440p
74.2 FPS
i5-10400
  • The i5-10400 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-10400 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i5-10400 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i5-13600K
  • The i5-13600K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-13600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-13600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i5-13600K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i5-10400 vs i5-13600K specifications

i5-10400 vs i5-13600K Architecture

i5-10400 i5-13600K
CodenameComet LakeRaptor Lake-S
GenerationCore i5 (Comet Lake)Core i5 (Raptor Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Part#unknownSRMBD
Production StatusActiveActive

i5-10400 vs i5-13600K Cache

i5-10400 i5-13600K
Cache L164K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)2MB (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)24MB (shared)

i5-10400 vs i5-13600K Cores

i5-10400 i5-13600K
# of Cores614
# of Threads1220
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 630UHD Graphics 770
SMP # CPUs11

i5-10400 vs i5-13600K Features

i5-10400 i5-13600K

i5-10400 vs i5-13600K Notes

i5-10400 i5-13600K

i5-10400 vs i5-13600K Performance

i5-10400 i5-13600K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency2.9 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier29.0x35.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP65 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzup to 5.1 GHz

i5-10400 vs i5-13600K Physical

i5-10400 i5-13600K
Die Sizeunknown257 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1700
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i5-10400 vs i5-13600K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments