i3-9320 vs i5-10600K - Microsoft Flight Simulator Graphics 448SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9320 i5-10600K

Multi-Thread Performance

10144 Pts
14000 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2552 Pts
2850 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i3-9320 vs i5-10600K in Microsoft Flight Simulator using Graphics 448SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9320 i5-10600K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
23.8 FPS
1080p
26.0 FPS
1440p
20.8 FPS
1440p
22.8 FPS
2160p
16.2 FPS
2160p
17.7 FPS
w1440p
19.8 FPS
w1440p
21.7 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
46.0 FPS
1080p
49.7 FPS
1440p
40.9 FPS
1440p
44.4 FPS
2160p
32.9 FPS
2160p
35.6 FPS
w1440p
39.2 FPS
w1440p
42.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
68.3 FPS
1080p
73.4 FPS
1440p
61.1 FPS
1440p
65.9 FPS
2160p
49.6 FPS
2160p
53.4 FPS
w1440p
58.6 FPS
w1440p
63.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
112.8 FPS
1080p
120.9 FPS
1440p
101.4 FPS
1440p
109.0 FPS
2160p
83.0 FPS
2160p
89.1 FPS
w1440p
97.5 FPS
w1440p
104.8 FPS
i3-9320
  • The i3-9320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-9320 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i5-10600K
  • The i5-10600K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-10600K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-10600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-10600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-10600K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i3-9320 vs i5-10600K specifications

i3-9320 vs i5-10600K Architecture

i3-9320 i5-10600K
CodenameCoffee LakeComet Lake
GenerationCore i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Core i5 (Comet Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#unknownunknown
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedApr 2019May 2020

i3-9320 vs i5-10600K Cache

i3-9320 i5-10600K
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L36MB (shared)12MB (shared)

i3-9320 vs i5-10600K Cores

i3-9320 i5-10600K
# of Cores46
# of Threads412
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630UHD Graphics 630
SMP # CPUs11

i3-9320 vs i5-10600K Performance

i3-9320 i5-10600K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz4.1 GHz
Multiplier37.0x41.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP62 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzup to 4.8 GHz
Voltagevariablevariable

i3-9320 vs i5-10600K Physical

i3-9320 i5-10600K
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA1200
Process Size14 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1200
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i3-9320 vs i5-10600K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments