i3-9100 vs i3-10100 - Microsoft Flight Simulator GTX 980M - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9100 i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

9095 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2411 Pts
2531 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i3-9100 vs i3-10100 in Microsoft Flight Simulator using GTX 980M - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9100 i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
15.3 FPS
1080p
15.6 FPS
1440p
13.1 FPS
1440p
13.1 FPS
2160p
10.4 FPS
2160p
10.5 FPS
w1440p
12.5 FPS
w1440p
12.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
31.3 FPS
1080p
31.8 FPS
1440p
27.3 FPS
1440p
27.3 FPS
2160p
22.3 FPS
2160p
22.5 FPS
w1440p
26.2 FPS
w1440p
26.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
47.3 FPS
1080p
48.1 FPS
1440p
41.5 FPS
1440p
41.5 FPS
2160p
34.1 FPS
2160p
34.4 FPS
w1440p
39.9 FPS
w1440p
40.2 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
79.3 FPS
1080p
80.5 FPS
1440p
69.9 FPS
1440p
69.9 FPS
2160p
57.9 FPS
2160p
58.3 FPS
w1440p
67.3 FPS
w1440p
67.7 FPS
i3-9100
  • The i3-9100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10100
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-9100 vs i3-10100 specifications

i3-9100 vs i3-10100 Architecture

i3-9100 i3-10100

i3-9100 vs i3-10100 Cache

i3-9100 i3-10100

i3-9100 vs i3-10100 Cores

i3-9100 i3-10100

i3-9100 vs i3-10100 Performance

i3-9100 i3-10100
Frequency3.7 GHz3.60 GHz
TDP65 W65 W

i3-9100 vs i3-10100 Physical

i3-9100 i3-10100

Compare i3-9100 vs i3-10100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments