i3-4330 vs Phenom II X3 705e - Microsoft Flight Simulator Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-4330 Phenom II X3 705e

Multi-Thread Performance

5092 Pts
2227 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2031 Pts
844 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i3-4330 vs Phenom II X3 705e in Microsoft Flight Simulator using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-4330 Phenom II X3 705e

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
8.7 FPS
1080p
5.2 FPS
1440p
7.6 FPS
1440p
4.6 FPS
2160p
5.9 FPS
2160p
3.6 FPS
w1440p
7.2 FPS
w1440p
4.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
19.0 FPS
1080p
12.0 FPS
1440p
16.9 FPS
1440p
10.8 FPS
2160p
13.5 FPS
2160p
8.7 FPS
w1440p
16.1 FPS
w1440p
10.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
29.3 FPS
1080p
18.9 FPS
1440p
26.1 FPS
1440p
17.0 FPS
2160p
21.0 FPS
2160p
13.7 FPS
w1440p
25.0 FPS
w1440p
16.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
50.0 FPS
1080p
32.5 FPS
1440p
44.7 FPS
1440p
29.4 FPS
2160p
36.2 FPS
2160p
23.9 FPS
w1440p
42.7 FPS
w1440p
28.3 FPS
i3-4330
  • The i3-4330 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-4330 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-4330 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Phenom II X3 705e
  • The Phenom II X3 705e has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Phenom II X3 705e has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The Phenom II X3 705e has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.

Compare i3-4330 vs Phenom II X3 705e specifications

i3-4330 vs Phenom II X3 705e Architecture

i3-4330 Phenom II X3 705e
CodenameHaswellHeka
GenerationCore i3 (Haswell)Phenom II X3 (Heka)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR3DDR3
Part#SR1NMHD705EOCK3DGIHD705EOCGIBOX
Production StatusunknownEnd-of-life
ReleasedSep 2013Jun 2009

i3-4330 vs Phenom II X3 705e Cache

i3-4330 Phenom II X3 705e
Cache L164K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L34MB (shared)6MB (shared)

i3-4330 vs Phenom II X3 705e Cores

i3-4330 Phenom II X3 705e
# of Cores23
# of Threads43
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD 4600N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-4330 vs Phenom II X3 705e Features

i3-4330 Phenom II X3 705e
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x HTT AES-NI TSX CLMUL FMA3MMX 3DNow! SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A AMD64 NX bit AMD-V

i3-4330 vs Phenom II X3 705e Performance

i3-4330 Phenom II X3 705e
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz2.5 GHz
Multiplier35.0x12.5x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP54 W65 W
Turbo ClockN/AN/A
Voltageunknown1.25 V

i3-4330 vs Phenom II X3 705e Physical

i3-4330 Phenom II X3 705e
Die Size177 mm²258 mm²
PackageFC-LGA12CµPGA
Process Size22 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1150AMD Socket AM3
Transistors1400 million758 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i3-4330 vs Phenom II X3 705e in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments
R
reformatpitch 12 years ago
Intel Pentium G3430 or i3-4330?The computer will be for my parents for general/office use (nothing heavy like gaming, CAD work, etc.). And I know for a fact that whatever I build now, they'll be using it until it runs into the ground, so one of my biggest priorities is finding something that will stay relevant for up to 8 years.I've considered a lot of AMD's offerings, but I'm still leaning slightly towards Intel, which seems more suitable, especially because they run a lot of programs that are single-threaded, like MS Word or Excel. Another big thing about Intel that I like is they have integrated graphics that supports 2-3 independent displays, so I don't have to buy a video card to do a dual monitor setup.Anyway, the problem is, I've noticed that even basic tasks like browsing or watching HD videos on YouTube get pretty power hungry over the years. Given this, do you think a Pentium would still suffice or would an i3 have better staying power? At this point, I'm torn between an i3-4330 and a Pentium G3430.Thanks a lot!
0 0
W
wranglehyndburn 12 years ago
The two main difference between them is the G3430 lacks Hyper Threading. For most people the only apps that they use which can take advantage of HT is compression programs like 7-zip and WinRAR. The other thing that's different is the integrated graphics. The G3430 only has a Haswell generation Intel HD graphics core (no model #) while the i3-4330 has the Intel HD 4600. The Intel HD graphics core is more than enough to playback 1080p videos. Not sure if it's enough for 4k video though. Unless your parents are highly anticipating the release of 4k videos to be viewed on what I assume will be a 1980x1080 monitor, then there's no point in getting the Pentium G3430 since I am not sure if it can support 4k video. Then again, there is no sense in watching 4k video on a 1080p monitor.4k actually refers to several different resolutions, but for HDTV format it refers to 3840×2160 resolution; or "2160p".
0 0
S
sistonalumni 11 years ago
i3 4330 bottleneckSo i am running crysis 3 on my system now and im getting about 20-30 fps in welcome to the jungle chapter is that normal with my graphics card? Is it really my cpu the problem?cpu: i3 4330 3.5 ghzGpu: asus strix gtx 970 4gb
0 0
C
conclusiongigabyte 11 years ago
The i3 is likely to be the limiting factor in your setup. The GTX 970 can push Crysis 3 to about 80+ fps with a good rig. An i5 or i7 would see a big jump in performance.In other games you may not see much of a difference, however the Crysis games are generally very hard on all parts of your hardware, and your weakest piece will hold you back, which in your case is the i3.
0 0
F
FALSEfluid 11 years ago
i3-4150 vs. i3-4330These two are the same price on Amazon, but what the actual differences? Are there any?
0 0
F
frarchedalfred 11 years ago
Get the i3 4330 it is a little bit better. http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Core-i3-4330-vs-Intel-Core-i3-4150
0 0
A
adjectivesinver 11 years ago
i3 4330 bottleneckWill my i3 4330 bottleneck a lot a gtx 970? Cause im on a tight budget and i cant afford a i5 right now..
0 0
G
guapocolumn 11 years ago
Since your on a tight budget just go with the gtx 970.. it will bottleneck on those more cpu hungry games, but in the future u should update it to a i5 or better
0 0
V
vocalistheels 10 years ago
i3-4330 + GTX 760 Bottlenecks?I have recently purchased a Gigabyte WindforceX3 2GB GTX 760 and I was wondering if my pairing it with the i3-4330 in my current system would cause any bottlenecks.
0 0
M
meiosisrocky 10 years ago
I think you are appropriate and good.Try it with YOUR games and see.If you want to experiment a bit and find out what is the weak part,do a bit of testing.a) Run your games, but lower your resolution and eye candy. If your FPS increases, it indicates that your cpu is strong enough to drive a better graphics configuration.If your FPS stays the same, you are likely more cpu limited.b) Limit your cpu, either by reducing the OC, or, in windows power management, limit the maximum cpu% to something like 70%.Go to control panel/power options/change plan settings/change advanced power settings/processor power management/maximum processor state/ This will simulate what a lack of cpu power will do. Conversely what a 30% improvement in core speed might do.It is possible that both tests are positive, indicating that you have a well balanced system, and both cpu and gpu need to be upgraded to get better gaming FPS.
0 0