i3-12300 vs i3-10100 - Microsoft Flight Simulator RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
2531 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 in Microsoft Flight Simulator using RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
46.9 FPS
1080p
44.2 FPS
1440p
40.9 FPS
1440p
38.5 FPS
2160p
32.1 FPS
2160p
30.3 FPS
w1440p
39.1 FPS
w1440p
36.8 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
82.8 FPS
1080p
78.7 FPS
1440p
73.6 FPS
1440p
69.8 FPS
2160p
59.7 FPS
2160p
56.8 FPS
w1440p
70.8 FPS
w1440p
67.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
118.7 FPS
1080p
113.1 FPS
1440p
106.3 FPS
1440p
101.2 FPS
2160p
87.3 FPS
2160p
83.3 FPS
w1440p
102.5 FPS
w1440p
97.6 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
190.4 FPS
1080p
182.1 FPS
1440p
171.6 FPS
1440p
163.9 FPS
2160p
142.5 FPS
2160p
136.2 FPS
w1440p
165.8 FPS
w1440p
158.3 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10100
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-10100 specifications

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Architecture

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Cache

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Cores

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Performance

i3-12300 i3-10100
Frequency3.5 GHz3.60 GHz
TDP60 W65 W

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Physical

i3-12300 i3-10100

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-10100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments