i3-12300 vs i3-10100 - Microsoft Flight Simulator GTX 1650 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
2531 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 in Microsoft Flight Simulator using GTX 1650 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
11.6 FPS
1080p
11.0 FPS
1440p
10.2 FPS
1440p
9.6 FPS
2160p
8.0 FPS
2160p
7.6 FPS
w1440p
9.8 FPS
w1440p
9.2 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
24.5 FPS
1080p
23.4 FPS
1440p
21.9 FPS
1440p
20.8 FPS
2160p
17.7 FPS
2160p
16.9 FPS
w1440p
21.1 FPS
w1440p
20.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
37.4 FPS
1080p
35.8 FPS
1440p
33.6 FPS
1440p
31.9 FPS
2160p
27.3 FPS
2160p
26.1 FPS
w1440p
32.5 FPS
w1440p
30.8 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
63.3 FPS
1080p
60.6 FPS
1440p
57.0 FPS
1440p
54.2 FPS
2160p
46.6 FPS
2160p
44.7 FPS
w1440p
55.1 FPS
w1440p
52.3 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10100
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-10100 specifications

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Architecture

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Cache

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Cores

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Performance

i3-12300 i3-10100
Frequency3.5 GHz3.60 GHz
TDP60 W65 W

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Physical

i3-12300 i3-10100

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-10100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments