i3-12300 vs i3-10100 - Godfall GTX 1650 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
2531 Pts

Godfall

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 in Godfall using GTX 1650 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
34.2 FPS
1080p
32.3 FPS
1440p
22.9 FPS
1440p
21.6 FPS
2160p
10.9 FPS
2160p
10.3 FPS
w1440p
18.1 FPS
w1440p
17.1 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
63.1 FPS
1080p
60.0 FPS
1440p
44.5 FPS
1440p
42.3 FPS
2160p
23.2 FPS
2160p
22.1 FPS
w1440p
36.3 FPS
w1440p
34.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
91.9 FPS
1080p
87.7 FPS
1440p
66.1 FPS
1440p
63.0 FPS
2160p
35.5 FPS
2160p
33.9 FPS
w1440p
54.4 FPS
w1440p
51.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
149.6 FPS
1080p
143.2 FPS
1440p
109.4 FPS
1440p
104.4 FPS
2160p
60.2 FPS
2160p
57.4 FPS
w1440p
90.7 FPS
w1440p
86.7 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10100
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-10100 specifications

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Architecture

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Cache

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Cores

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Performance

i3-12300 i3-10100
Frequency3.5 GHz3.60 GHz
TDP60 W65 W

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Physical

i3-12300 i3-10100

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-10100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments