i3-12100 vs Core2 Duo E6420 - Microsoft Flight Simulator RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 Core2 Duo E6420

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
1361 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
807 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i3-12100 vs Core2 Duo E6420 in Microsoft Flight Simulator using RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 Core2 Duo E6420

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
46.4 FPS
1080p
14.8 FPS
1440p
40.5 FPS
1440p
12.9 FPS
2160p
31.8 FPS
2160p
10.2 FPS
w1440p
38.7 FPS
w1440p
12.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
82.0 FPS
1080p
30.4 FPS
1440p
73.0 FPS
1440p
26.9 FPS
2160p
59.2 FPS
2160p
21.9 FPS
w1440p
70.2 FPS
w1440p
26.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
117.6 FPS
1080p
46.0 FPS
1440p
105.4 FPS
1440p
41.0 FPS
2160p
86.6 FPS
2160p
33.6 FPS
w1440p
101.6 FPS
w1440p
39.6 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
188.9 FPS
1080p
77.2 FPS
1440p
170.4 FPS
1440p
69.0 FPS
2160p
141.5 FPS
2160p
57.0 FPS
w1440p
164.5 FPS
w1440p
66.8 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12100 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Core2 Duo E6420
  • The Core2 Duo E6420 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM

Compare i3-12100 vs Core2 Duo E6420 specifications

i3-12100 vs Core2 Duo E6420 Architecture

i3-12100 Core2 Duo E6420
CodenameAlder Lake-SConroe
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core 2 Duo (Conroe)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Part#SRL62SLA4T
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i3-12100 vs Core2 Duo E6420 Cache

i3-12100 Core2 Duo E6420
Cache L180K (per core)64K
Cache L21.25MB (per core)4MB

i3-12100 vs Core2 Duo E6420 Cores

i3-12100 Core2 Duo E6420
# of Cores42
# of Threads82
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12100 vs Core2 Duo E6420 Performance

i3-12100 Core2 Duo E6420
Base Clock100 MHz266 MHz
Frequency3.3 GHz2.133 GHz
Multiplier33.0x8.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzN/A

i3-12100 vs Core2 Duo E6420 Physical

i3-12100 Core2 Duo E6420
Die Size163 mm²111 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA6
Process Size10 nm65 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 775

Compare i3-12100 vs Core2 Duo E6420 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments