i3-12100 vs i9-11900K - Microsoft Flight Simulator R9 Nano - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i9-11900K

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
23993 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
3253 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i3-12100 vs i9-11900K in Microsoft Flight Simulator using R9 Nano - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i9-11900K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
22.3 FPS
1080p
24.1 FPS
1440p
19.0 FPS
1440p
19.7 FPS
2160p
15.1 FPS
2160p
15.6 FPS
w1440p
18.2 FPS
w1440p
18.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
43.5 FPS
1080p
46.5 FPS
1440p
37.8 FPS
1440p
39.0 FPS
2160p
30.9 FPS
2160p
31.8 FPS
w1440p
36.4 FPS
w1440p
37.7 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
64.7 FPS
1080p
69.0 FPS
1440p
56.7 FPS
1440p
58.4 FPS
2160p
46.8 FPS
2160p
48.1 FPS
w1440p
54.7 FPS
w1440p
56.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
107.1 FPS
1080p
113.9 FPS
1440p
94.3 FPS
1440p
97.1 FPS
2160p
78.4 FPS
2160p
80.5 FPS
w1440p
91.1 FPS
w1440p
93.9 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i9-11900K
  • The i9-11900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i9-11900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-11900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-11900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-11900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i3-12100 vs i9-11900K specifications

i3-12100 vs i9-11900K Architecture

i3-12100 i9-11900K
CodenameAlder Lake-SRocket Lake
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i9 (Rocket Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRL62unknown
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-12100 vs i9-11900K Cache

i3-12100 i9-11900K
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)16MB (shared)

i3-12100 vs i9-11900K Cores

i3-12100 i9-11900K
# of Cores48
# of Threads816
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730UHD Graphics 750
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12100 vs i9-11900K Performance

i3-12100 i9-11900K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.3 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier33.0x35.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP60 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzup to 5.3 GHz

i3-12100 vs i9-11900K Physical

i3-12100 i9-11900K
Die Size163 mm²unknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA1200
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1200

Compare i3-12100 vs i9-11900K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments