i3-12100 vs i3-10300 - Microsoft Flight Simulator 680M - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i3-10300

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
10980 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
2690 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 in Microsoft Flight Simulator using 680M - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i3-10300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
25.3 FPS
1080p
24.6 FPS
1440p
22.2 FPS
1440p
21.5 FPS
2160p
17.3 FPS
2160p
16.8 FPS
w1440p
21.1 FPS
w1440p
20.5 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
48.6 FPS
1080p
47.4 FPS
1440p
43.3 FPS
1440p
42.1 FPS
2160p
34.8 FPS
2160p
34.0 FPS
w1440p
41.5 FPS
w1440p
40.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
71.8 FPS
1080p
70.2 FPS
1440p
64.5 FPS
1440p
62.8 FPS
2160p
52.4 FPS
2160p
51.1 FPS
w1440p
61.8 FPS
w1440p
60.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
118.3 FPS
1080p
115.7 FPS
1440p
106.7 FPS
1440p
104.1 FPS
2160p
87.5 FPS
2160p
85.5 FPS
w1440p
102.5 FPS
w1440p
100.2 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10300
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-10300 specifications

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Architecture

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Cache

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Cores

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Performance

i3-12100 i3-10300
Frequency3.3 GHz3.70 GHz
TDP60 W65 W

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Physical

i3-12100 i3-10300

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-10300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments