i3-10100 vs i5-10400 - Microsoft Flight Simulator TITAN Xp - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-10100 i5-10400

Multi-Thread Performance

9549 Pts
12716 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2531 Pts
2609 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i3-10100 vs i5-10400 in Microsoft Flight Simulator using TITAN Xp - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-10100 i5-10400

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
37.3 FPS
1080p
39.7 FPS
1440p
32.8 FPS
1440p
33.8 FPS
2160p
26.0 FPS
2160p
26.8 FPS
w1440p
31.4 FPS
w1440p
32.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
68.0 FPS
1080p
71.7 FPS
1440p
60.8 FPS
1440p
62.4 FPS
2160p
49.7 FPS
2160p
51.0 FPS
w1440p
58.6 FPS
w1440p
60.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
98.6 FPS
1080p
103.7 FPS
1440p
88.8 FPS
1440p
91.0 FPS
2160p
73.4 FPS
2160p
75.3 FPS
w1440p
85.7 FPS
w1440p
88.0 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
160.0 FPS
1080p
167.8 FPS
1440p
144.9 FPS
1440p
148.3 FPS
2160p
120.9 FPS
2160p
123.8 FPS
w1440p
140.1 FPS
w1440p
143.5 FPS
i3-10100
  • The i3-10100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i5-10400
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-10100 vs i5-10400 specifications

i3-10100 vs i5-10400

i3-10100 i5-10400

i3-10100 vs i5-10400 Compatibility

i3-10100 i5-10400

i3-10100 vs i5-10400 General

i3-10100 i5-10400

i3-10100 vs i5-10400 Integrated Graphics

i3-10100 i5-10400

i3-10100 vs i5-10400 Memory Specs

i3-10100 i5-10400

i3-10100 vs i5-10400 Performance

i3-10100 i5-10400
Frequency3.60 GHz2.9 GHz
TDP65 W65 W

i3-10100 vs i5-10400 Technical Specs

i3-10100 i5-10400

i3-10100 vs i5-10400 Technologies and Extensions

i3-10100 i5-10400

i3-10100 vs i5-10400 Virtualization Technologies

i3-10100 i5-10400

Compare i3-10100 vs i5-10400 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments