i3-10100 vs i3-3240 - Microsoft Flight Simulator GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-10100 i3-3240

Multi-Thread Performance

9549 Pts
4310 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2531 Pts
1808 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i3-10100 vs i3-3240 in Microsoft Flight Simulator using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-10100 i3-3240

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
12.3 FPS
1080p
6.3 FPS
1440p
10.7 FPS
1440p
5.5 FPS
2160p
8.5 FPS
2160p
4.3 FPS
w1440p
10.3 FPS
w1440p
5.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
25.8 FPS
1080p
14.3 FPS
1440p
22.8 FPS
1440p
12.7 FPS
2160p
18.6 FPS
2160p
10.2 FPS
w1440p
22.1 FPS
w1440p
12.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
39.3 FPS
1080p
22.3 FPS
1440p
35.0 FPS
1440p
19.8 FPS
2160p
28.8 FPS
2160p
16.0 FPS
w1440p
33.9 FPS
w1440p
19.2 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
66.4 FPS
1080p
38.2 FPS
1440p
59.3 FPS
1440p
34.1 FPS
2160p
49.0 FPS
2160p
27.7 FPS
w1440p
57.4 FPS
w1440p
33.1 FPS
i3-10100
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
i3-3240
  • The i3-3240 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i3-10100 vs i3-3240 specifications

i3-10100 vs i3-3240

i3-10100 i3-3240

i3-10100 vs i3-3240 Compatibility

i3-10100 i3-3240

i3-10100 vs i3-3240 General

i3-10100 i3-3240

i3-10100 vs i3-3240 Integrated Graphics

i3-10100 i3-3240

i3-10100 vs i3-3240 Memory Specs

i3-10100 i3-3240

i3-10100 vs i3-3240 Performance

i3-10100 i3-3240
Frequency3.60 GHz3.4 GHz
TDP65 W55 W

i3-10100 vs i3-3240 Technical Specs

i3-10100 i3-3240

i3-10100 vs i3-3240 Technologies and Extensions

i3-10100 i3-3240

i3-10100 vs i3-3240 Virtualization Technologies

i3-10100 i3-3240

Compare i3-10100 vs i3-3240 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments