i3-8300 vs i5-12400 - Hitman GT 1030 - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-8300 i5-12400

Multi-Thread Performance

8715 Pts
16800 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2172 Pts
3240 Pts

Hitman

i3-8300 vs i5-12400 in Hitman using GT 1030 - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-8300 i5-12400

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
31.3 FPS
1080p
35.7 FPS
1440p
22.3 FPS
1440p
24.4 FPS
2160p
FPS
2160p
FPS
w1440p
FPS
w1440p
FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
58.4 FPS
1080p
65.4 FPS
1440p
43.5 FPS
1440p
47.1 FPS
2160p
nan FPS
2160p
nan FPS
w1440p
nan FPS
w1440p
nan FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
85.5 FPS
1080p
95.2 FPS
1440p
64.7 FPS
1440p
69.7 FPS
2160p
nan FPS
2160p
nan FPS
w1440p
nan FPS
w1440p
nan FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
139.7 FPS
1080p
154.7 FPS
1440p
107.1 FPS
1440p
115.0 FPS
2160p
nan FPS
2160p
nan FPS
w1440p
nan FPS
w1440p
nan FPS
i3-8300
  • The i3-8300 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-8300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i5-12400
  • The i5-12400 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-12400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-12400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i5-12400 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i3-8300 vs i5-12400 specifications

i3-8300 vs i5-12400 Architecture

i3-8300 i5-12400
CodenameCoffee LakeAlder Lake-S
GenerationCore i3 (Coffee Lake)Core i5 (Alder Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Part#SR3XYSRL4V SRL5Y
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-8300 vs i5-12400 Cache

i3-8300 i5-12400
Cache L164K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)1.25MB (per core)
Cache L38MB (shared)18MB (shared)

i3-8300 vs i5-12400 Cores

i3-8300 i5-12400
# of Cores46
# of Threads412
Integrated GraphicsN/AUHD Graphics 730
SMP # CPUs11

i3-8300 vs i5-12400 Features

i3-8300 i5-12400

i3-8300 vs i5-12400 Performance

i3-8300 i5-12400
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz2.5 GHz
Multiplier37.0x25.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP62 W65 W
Turbo ClockN/Aup to 4.4 GHz

i3-8300 vs i5-12400 Physical

i3-8300 i5-12400
Die Sizeunknown163 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1700

Compare i3-8300 vs i5-12400 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments