i3-8300 vs i7-13700K - GRID 2 R9 290X - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-8300 i7-13700K

Multi-Thread Performance

8715 Pts
28603 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2172 Pts
4521 Pts

GRID 2

i3-8300 vs i7-13700K in GRID 2 using R9 290X - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-8300 i7-13700K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
120.9 FPS
1080p
145.4 FPS
1440p
88.1 FPS
1440p
95.6 FPS
2160p
52.0 FPS
2160p
56.4 FPS
w1440p
75.0 FPS
w1440p
81.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
184.8 FPS
1080p
215.5 FPS
1440p
141.6 FPS
1440p
151.7 FPS
2160p
90.4 FPS
2160p
96.9 FPS
w1440p
123.6 FPS
w1440p
132.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
248.6 FPS
1080p
285.6 FPS
1440p
195.1 FPS
1440p
207.8 FPS
2160p
128.9 FPS
2160p
137.5 FPS
w1440p
172.1 FPS
w1440p
183.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
376.3 FPS
1080p
425.8 FPS
1440p
302.1 FPS
1440p
320.0 FPS
2160p
205.7 FPS
2160p
218.6 FPS
w1440p
269.3 FPS
w1440p
285.3 FPS
i3-8300
  • The i3-8300 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-8300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i7-13700K
  • The i7-13700K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i7-13700K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i7-13700K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i7-13700K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i3-8300 vs i7-13700K specifications

i3-8300 vs i7-13700K Architecture

i3-8300 i7-13700K
CodenameCoffee LakeRaptor Lake-S
GenerationCore i3 (Coffee Lake)Core i7 (Raptor Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Part#SR3XYSRMB8
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-8300 vs i7-13700K Cache

i3-8300 i7-13700K
Cache L164K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)2MB (per core)
Cache L38MB (shared)30MB (shared)

i3-8300 vs i7-13700K Cores

i3-8300 i7-13700K
# of Cores416
# of Threads424
Integrated GraphicsN/AUHD Graphics 770
SMP # CPUs11

i3-8300 vs i7-13700K Features

i3-8300 i7-13700K

i3-8300 vs i7-13700K Performance

i3-8300 i7-13700K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier37.0x34.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP62 W125 W
Turbo ClockN/Aup to 5.4 GHz

i3-8300 vs i7-13700K Physical

i3-8300 i7-13700K
Die Sizeunknown257 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1700
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i3-8300 vs i7-13700K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments