i5-10400 vs i9-10900K - GreedFall Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-10400 i9-10900K

Multi-Thread Performance

12716 Pts
22851 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2609 Pts
3099 Pts

GreedFall

i5-10400 vs i9-10900K in GreedFall using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-10400 i9-10900K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
46.7 FPS
1080p
48.4 FPS
1440p
33.6 FPS
1440p
34.8 FPS
2160p
13.5 FPS
2160p
14.0 FPS
w1440p
25.2 FPS
w1440p
26.1 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
82.5 FPS
1080p
85.0 FPS
1440p
62.1 FPS
1440p
64.0 FPS
2160p
28.0 FPS
2160p
28.9 FPS
w1440p
48.4 FPS
w1440p
49.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
118.2 FPS
1080p
121.7 FPS
1440p
90.6 FPS
1440p
93.2 FPS
2160p
42.6 FPS
2160p
43.9 FPS
w1440p
71.6 FPS
w1440p
73.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
189.8 FPS
1080p
195.0 FPS
1440p
147.6 FPS
1440p
151.7 FPS
2160p
71.6 FPS
2160p
73.8 FPS
w1440p
118.0 FPS
w1440p
121.3 FPS
i5-10400
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i5-10400 vs i9-10900K specifications

i5-10400 vs i9-10900K Architecture

i5-10400 i9-10900K
CodenameComet LakeComet Lake
GenerationCore i5 (Comet Lake)Core i9 (Comet Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#unknownunknown
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedMay 2020May 2020

i5-10400 vs i9-10900K Cache

i5-10400 i9-10900K
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)16MB (shared)

i5-10400 vs i9-10900K Cores

i5-10400 i9-10900K
# of Cores610
# of Threads1220
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 630UHD 630
SMP # CPUs11

i5-10400 vs i9-10900K Features

i5-10400 i9-10900K
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0

i5-10400 vs i9-10900K Notes

i5-10400 i9-10900K
This processor comes with an unlocked BCLK multiplier, allowing users to set the multiplier value higher than shipped value, to facilitate better overclocking.This processor comes with an unlocked BCLK multiplier, allowing users to set the multiplier value higher than shipped value, to facilitate better overclocking.

i5-10400 vs i9-10900K Performance

i5-10400 i9-10900K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency2.9 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier29.0x37.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP65 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzup to 5.3 GHz
Voltagevariablevariable

i5-10400 vs i9-10900K Physical

i5-10400 i9-10900K
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA1200
Process Size14 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1200
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i5-10400 vs i9-10900K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments