i5-10400 vs i5-14600K - GreedFall GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-10400 i5-14600K

Multi-Thread Performance

12716 Pts
21168 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2609 Pts
4308 Pts

GreedFall

i5-10400 vs i5-14600K in GreedFall using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-10400 i5-14600K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
47.6 FPS
1080p
52.9 FPS
1440p
34.1 FPS
1440p
36.3 FPS
2160p
14.2 FPS
2160p
15.1 FPS
w1440p
25.8 FPS
w1440p
27.5 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
83.8 FPS
1080p
91.8 FPS
1440p
62.9 FPS
1440p
66.4 FPS
2160p
29.3 FPS
2160p
30.9 FPS
w1440p
49.4 FPS
w1440p
52.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
120.1 FPS
1080p
130.6 FPS
1440p
91.7 FPS
1440p
96.5 FPS
2160p
44.4 FPS
2160p
46.8 FPS
w1440p
73.0 FPS
w1440p
76.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
192.5 FPS
1080p
208.4 FPS
1440p
149.3 FPS
1440p
156.7 FPS
2160p
74.6 FPS
2160p
78.4 FPS
w1440p
120.2 FPS
w1440p
126.3 FPS
i5-10400
  • The i5-10400 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-10400 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i5-10400 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i5-14600K
  • The i5-14600K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-14600K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i5-10400 vs i5-14600K specifications

i5-10400 vs i5-14600K Architecture

i5-10400 i5-14600K
CodenameComet LakeRaptor Lake-R
GenerationCore i5 (Comet Lake)Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5

i5-10400 vs i5-14600K Cache

i5-10400 i5-14600K
Cache L164K (per core)80 KB (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)2 MB (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)24 MB (shared)

i5-10400 vs i5-14600K Cores

i5-10400 i5-14600K

i5-10400 vs i5-14600K Features

i5-10400 i5-14600K

i5-10400 vs i5-14600K Notes

i5-10400 i5-14600K

i5-10400 vs i5-14600K Performance

i5-10400 i5-14600K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency2.9 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier29.0x35.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP65 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzup to 5.3 GHz

i5-10400 vs i5-14600K Physical

i5-10400 i5-14600K
Die Sizeunknown257 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1700
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i5-10400 vs i5-14600K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments