i3-7320 vs i9-13900K - Godfall Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-7320 i9-13900K

Multi-Thread Performance

6541 Pts
34549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2364 Pts
4683 Pts

Godfall

i3-7320 vs i9-13900K in Godfall using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-7320 i9-13900K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
45.7 FPS
1080p
64.8 FPS
1440p
30.5 FPS
1440p
41.3 FPS
2160p
14.5 FPS
2160p
19.6 FPS
w1440p
24.1 FPS
w1440p
32.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
81.0 FPS
1080p
109.1 FPS
1440p
57.1 FPS
1440p
74.2 FPS
2160p
29.8 FPS
2160p
38.9 FPS
w1440p
46.5 FPS
w1440p
60.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
116.2 FPS
1080p
153.5 FPS
1440p
83.7 FPS
1440p
107.1 FPS
2160p
45.2 FPS
2160p
58.1 FPS
w1440p
69.0 FPS
w1440p
88.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
186.7 FPS
1080p
242.1 FPS
1440p
136.9 FPS
1440p
172.9 FPS
2160p
75.9 FPS
2160p
96.7 FPS
w1440p
113.9 FPS
w1440p
144.2 FPS
i3-7320
  • The i3-7320 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-7320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i9-13900K
  • The i9-13900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-13900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-13900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i9-13900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i3-7320 vs i9-13900K specifications

i3-7320 vs i9-13900K Architecture

i3-7320 i9-13900K
CodenameKaby LakeRaptor Lake-S
GenerationCore i3 (Kaby Lake)Core i9 (Raptor Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Part#SR358SRMBH
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-7320 vs i9-13900K Cache

i3-7320 i9-13900K
Cache L164K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)2MB (per core)
Cache L34MB (shared)36MB (shared)

i3-7320 vs i9-13900K Cores

i3-7320 i9-13900K
# of Cores224
# of Threads432
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD 630UHD Graphics 770
SMP # CPUs11

i3-7320 vs i9-13900K Features

i3-7320 i9-13900K

i3-7320 vs i9-13900K Performance

i3-7320 i9-13900K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency4.1 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier41.0x30.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP51 W125 W
Turbo ClockN/Aup to 5.8 GHz

i3-7320 vs i9-13900K Physical

i3-7320 i9-13900K
Die Sizeunknown257 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1700
tCaseMax65°C72°C

Compare i3-7320 vs i9-13900K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments