i3-12100 vs i3-10300 - Godfall R9 280X - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i3-10300

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
10980 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
2690 Pts

Godfall

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 in Godfall using R9 280X - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i3-10300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
44.2 FPS
1080p
43.2 FPS
1440p
27.1 FPS
1440p
26.8 FPS
2160p
12.9 FPS
2160p
12.8 FPS
w1440p
21.4 FPS
w1440p
21.2 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
78.7 FPS
1080p
77.1 FPS
1440p
51.5 FPS
1440p
51.0 FPS
2160p
26.9 FPS
2160p
26.7 FPS
w1440p
42.0 FPS
w1440p
41.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
113.1 FPS
1080p
111.1 FPS
1440p
76.0 FPS
1440p
75.3 FPS
2160p
41.0 FPS
2160p
40.7 FPS
w1440p
62.5 FPS
w1440p
62.0 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
182.1 FPS
1080p
178.9 FPS
1440p
124.9 FPS
1440p
123.8 FPS
2160p
69.0 FPS
2160p
68.6 FPS
w1440p
103.7 FPS
w1440p
102.9 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10300
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-10300 specifications

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Architecture

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Cache

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Cores

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Performance

i3-12100 i3-10300
Frequency3.3 GHz3.70 GHz
TDP60 W65 W

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Physical

i3-12100 i3-10300

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-10300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments