i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 440 - Forza Horizon 4 RTX 2070 SUPER Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K Athlon II X3 440

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
2571 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
1015 Pts

Forza Horizon 4

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 440 in Forza Horizon 4 using RTX 2070 SUPER Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 440

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
92.4 FPS
1080p
36.2 FPS
1440p
77.0 FPS
1440p
30.2 FPS
2160p
50.4 FPS
2160p
19.8 FPS
w1440p
68.2 FPS
w1440p
26.7 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
147.4 FPS
1080p
66.2 FPS
1440p
126.4 FPS
1440p
56.6 FPS
2160p
88.0 FPS
2160p
39.2 FPS
w1440p
114.0 FPS
w1440p
50.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
202.4 FPS
1080p
96.3 FPS
1440p
175.7 FPS
1440p
83.0 FPS
2160p
125.7 FPS
2160p
58.6 FPS
w1440p
159.8 FPS
w1440p
75.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
312.5 FPS
1080p
156.3 FPS
1440p
274.4 FPS
1440p
135.9 FPS
2160p
201.0 FPS
2160p
97.5 FPS
w1440p
251.3 FPS
w1440p
123.4 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i9-10900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X3 440
  • The Athlon II X3 440 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM

Compare i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 440 specifications

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 440 Architecture

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 440
CodenameComet LakeRana
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Athlon II X3 (Rana)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownADX440WFK32GIADX440WFGIBOXADX440WFK32GMADX440WFGMBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedMay 2020Jan 2010

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 440 Cache

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 440
Cache L164K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 440 Cores

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 440
# of Cores103
# of Threads203
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 440 Features

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 440
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX 3DNow! SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A AMD64 NX bit AMD-V

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 440 Notes

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 440

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 440 Performance

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 440
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier37.0x15.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.425 V

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 440 Physical

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 440
Die Sizeunknown169 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1200µPGA
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown300 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 440 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments