i9-10900K vs Phenom 8250e Triple-Core - Final Fantasy XV Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K Phenom 8250e Triple-Core

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
1619 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
620 Pts

Final Fantasy XV

i9-10900K vs Phenom 8250e Triple-Core in Final Fantasy XV using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K Phenom 8250e Triple-Core

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
42.5 FPS
1080p
9.5 FPS
1440p
31.0 FPS
1440p
6.9 FPS
2160p
18.0 FPS
2160p
4.0 FPS
w1440p
26.2 FPS
w1440p
5.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
76.1 FPS
1080p
20.6 FPS
1440p
57.9 FPS
1440p
15.5 FPS
2160p
36.1 FPS
2160p
9.5 FPS
w1440p
50.1 FPS
w1440p
13.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
109.6 FPS
1080p
31.6 FPS
1440p
84.8 FPS
1440p
24.1 FPS
2160p
54.2 FPS
2160p
15.0 FPS
w1440p
73.9 FPS
w1440p
21.0 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
176.7 FPS
1080p
53.7 FPS
1440p
138.7 FPS
1440p
41.2 FPS
2160p
90.3 FPS
2160p
26.1 FPS
w1440p
121.6 FPS
w1440p
36.2 FPS
i9-10900K
    Phenom 8250e Triple-Core

      Compare i9-10900K vs Phenom 8250e Triple-Core specifications

      i9-10900K vs Phenom 8250e Triple-Core Architecture

      i9-10900K Phenom 8250e Triple-Core

      i9-10900K vs Phenom 8250e Triple-Core Cache

      i9-10900K Phenom 8250e Triple-Core

      i9-10900K vs Phenom 8250e Triple-Core Cores

      i9-10900K Phenom 8250e Triple-Core

      i9-10900K vs Phenom 8250e Triple-Core Features

      i9-10900K Phenom 8250e Triple-Core

      i9-10900K vs Phenom 8250e Triple-Core Notes

      i9-10900K Phenom 8250e Triple-Core

      i9-10900K vs Phenom 8250e Triple-Core Performance

      i9-10900K Phenom 8250e Triple-Core

      i9-10900K vs Phenom 8250e Triple-Core Physical

      i9-10900K Phenom 8250e Triple-Core

      Compare i9-10900K vs Phenom 8250e Triple-Core in more games


      Discussion and Comments

      Share Your Comments