i5-12400 vs i3-9100 - Final Fantasy XV Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-12400 i3-9100

Multi-Thread Performance

16800 Pts
9095 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3240 Pts
2411 Pts

Final Fantasy XV

i5-12400 vs i3-9100 in Final Fantasy XV using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-12400 i3-9100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
42.0 FPS
1080p
37.6 FPS
1440p
30.6 FPS
1440p
27.4 FPS
2160p
17.8 FPS
2160p
15.9 FPS
w1440p
25.9 FPS
w1440p
23.2 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
75.3 FPS
1080p
68.4 FPS
1440p
57.3 FPS
1440p
52.0 FPS
2160p
35.7 FPS
2160p
32.4 FPS
w1440p
49.6 FPS
w1440p
45.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
108.6 FPS
1080p
99.3 FPS
1440p
83.9 FPS
1440p
76.7 FPS
2160p
53.7 FPS
2160p
48.8 FPS
w1440p
73.2 FPS
w1440p
66.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
175.1 FPS
1080p
161.0 FPS
1440p
137.3 FPS
1440p
126.0 FPS
2160p
89.5 FPS
2160p
81.7 FPS
w1440p
120.5 FPS
w1440p
110.5 FPS
i5-12400
  • The i5-12400 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-12400 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-12400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-12400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
i3-9100
  • The i3-9100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-9100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i5-12400 vs i3-9100 specifications

i5-12400 vs i3-9100 Architecture

i5-12400 i3-9100
CodenameAlder Lake-SCoffee Lake
GenerationCore i5 (Alder Lake-S)Core i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRL4V SRL5YSR3XQ
Production StatusActiveActive

i5-12400 vs i3-9100 Cache

i5-12400 i3-9100
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L318MB (shared)6MB (shared)

i5-12400 vs i3-9100 Cores

i5-12400 i3-9100
# of Cores64
# of Threads124
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i5-12400 vs i3-9100 Performance

i5-12400 i3-9100
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency2.5 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier25.0x37.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzN/A

i5-12400 vs i3-9100 Physical

i5-12400 i3-9100
Die Size163 mm²unknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA1151
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1151

Compare i5-12400 vs i3-9100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments