i5-10400 vs i9-14900K - Fallout 76 Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-10400 i9-14900K

Multi-Thread Performance

12716 Pts
41458 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2609 Pts
5619 Pts

Fallout 76

i5-10400 vs i9-14900K in Fallout 76 using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-10400 i9-14900K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
69.5 FPS
1080p
78.4 FPS
1440p
49.8 FPS
1440p
53.4 FPS
2160p
26.6 FPS
2160p
28.6 FPS
w1440p
40.9 FPS
w1440p
43.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
115.8 FPS
1080p
128.3 FPS
1440p
87.1 FPS
1440p
92.5 FPS
2160p
50.7 FPS
2160p
54.0 FPS
w1440p
73.6 FPS
w1440p
78.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
162.2 FPS
1080p
178.2 FPS
1440p
124.5 FPS
1440p
131.6 FPS
2160p
74.8 FPS
2160p
79.4 FPS
w1440p
106.3 FPS
w1440p
112.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
254.8 FPS
1080p
278.0 FPS
1440p
199.2 FPS
1440p
209.9 FPS
2160p
123.1 FPS
2160p
130.3 FPS
w1440p
171.6 FPS
w1440p
181.1 FPS
i5-10400
  • The i5-10400 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-10400 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i5-10400 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i9-14900K
  • The i9-14900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-14900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i5-10400 vs i9-14900K specifications

i5-10400 vs i9-14900K Architecture

i5-10400 i9-14900K
CodenameComet LakeRaptor Lake-R
GenerationCore i5 (Comet Lake)Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5

i5-10400 vs i9-14900K Cache

i5-10400 i9-14900K
Cache L164K (per core)80 KB (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)2 MB (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)36 MB (shared)

i5-10400 vs i9-14900K Cores

i5-10400 i9-14900K

i5-10400 vs i9-14900K Features

i5-10400 i9-14900K

i5-10400 vs i9-14900K Notes

i5-10400 i9-14900K

i5-10400 vs i9-14900K Performance

i5-10400 i9-14900K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency2.9 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier29.0x32.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP65 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzup to 6 GHz

i5-10400 vs i9-14900K Physical

i5-10400 i9-14900K
Die Sizeunknown257 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1700

Compare i5-10400 vs i9-14900K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments