i3-9320 vs i5-11600K - F1 2016 Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9320 i5-11600K

Multi-Thread Performance

10144 Pts
14700 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2552 Pts
2992 Pts

F1 2016

i3-9320 vs i5-11600K in F1 2016 using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9320 i5-11600K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
70.1 FPS
1080p
78.0 FPS
1440p
60.2 FPS
1440p
67.0 FPS
2160p
38.2 FPS
2160p
42.5 FPS
w1440p
52.7 FPS
w1440p
58.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
116.7 FPS
1080p
127.7 FPS
1440p
102.5 FPS
1440p
112.3 FPS
2160p
69.4 FPS
2160p
76.1 FPS
w1440p
91.5 FPS
w1440p
100.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
163.3 FPS
1080p
177.5 FPS
1440p
144.8 FPS
1440p
157.6 FPS
2160p
100.6 FPS
2160p
109.6 FPS
w1440p
130.3 FPS
w1440p
141.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
256.4 FPS
1080p
277.0 FPS
1440p
229.4 FPS
1440p
248.1 FPS
2160p
162.9 FPS
2160p
176.7 FPS
w1440p
207.8 FPS
w1440p
224.8 FPS
i3-9320
  • The i3-9320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-9320 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i5-11600K
  • The i5-11600K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-11600K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-11600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-11600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-11600K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i3-9320 vs i5-11600K specifications

i3-9320 vs i5-11600K Architecture

i3-9320 i5-11600K
CodenameCoffee LakeRocket Lake
GenerationCore i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Core i5 (Rocket Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#unknownunknown
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedApr 2019Mar 16th, 2021

i3-9320 vs i5-11600K Cache

i3-9320 i5-11600K
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L36MB (shared)12MB (shared)

i3-9320 vs i5-11600K Cores

i3-9320 i5-11600K
# of Cores46
# of Threads412
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630UHD Graphics 750
SMP # CPUs11

i3-9320 vs i5-11600K Performance

i3-9320 i5-11600K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.9 GHz
Multiplier37.0x39.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP62 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzup to 4.9 GHz
Voltagevariablevariable

i3-9320 vs i5-11600K Physical

i3-9320 i5-11600K
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA1200
Process Size14 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1200
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i3-9320 vs i5-11600K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments