i3-12300 vs i3-10100 - F1 2016 Graphics 448SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
2531 Pts

F1 2016

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 in F1 2016 using Graphics 448SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
87.7 FPS
1080p
82.7 FPS
1440p
80.8 FPS
1440p
76.2 FPS
2160p
52.2 FPS
2160p
49.3 FPS
w1440p
71.2 FPS
w1440p
67.1 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
141.1 FPS
1080p
134.2 FPS
1440p
131.6 FPS
1440p
125.2 FPS
2160p
90.7 FPS
2160p
86.4 FPS
w1440p
118.2 FPS
w1440p
112.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
194.4 FPS
1080p
185.8 FPS
1440p
182.4 FPS
1440p
174.3 FPS
2160p
129.3 FPS
2160p
123.5 FPS
w1440p
165.3 FPS
w1440p
157.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
301.1 FPS
1080p
288.8 FPS
1440p
284.1 FPS
1440p
272.4 FPS
2160p
206.3 FPS
2160p
197.7 FPS
w1440p
259.3 FPS
w1440p
248.4 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10100
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-10100 specifications

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Architecture

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Cache

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Cores

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Performance

i3-12300 i3-10100
Frequency3.5 GHz3.60 GHz
TDP60 W65 W

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Physical

i3-12300 i3-10100

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-10100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments