Phenom II X3 720
i7-9700F
Multi-Thread Performance
Single-Thread Performance
F1 2016
Phenom II X3 720 vs i7-9700F in F1 2016 using GT 1030 - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions
Phenom II X3 720
i7-9700F
Ultra Quality
| Resolution |
Frames Per Second |
| 1080p |
|
| 1080p |
|
| 1440p |
|
| 1440p |
|
| 2160p |
|
| 2160p |
|
| w1440p |
|
| w1440p |
|
High Quality
| Resolution |
Frames Per Second |
| 1080p |
|
| 1080p |
|
| 1440p |
|
| 1440p |
|
| 2160p |
|
| 2160p |
|
| w1440p |
|
| w1440p |
|
Medium Quality
| Resolution |
Frames Per Second |
| 1080p |
|
| 1080p |
|
| 1440p |
|
| 1440p |
|
| 2160p |
|
| 2160p |
|
| w1440p |
|
| w1440p |
|
Low Quality
| Resolution |
Frames Per Second |
| 1080p |
|
| 1080p |
|
| 1440p |
|
| 1440p |
|
| 2160p |
|
| 2160p |
|
| w1440p |
|
| w1440p |
|
Phenom II X3 720
- The Phenom II X3 720 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
- The Phenom II X3 720 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
- The Phenom II X3 720 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
- The Phenom II X3 720 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
- For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
i7-9700F
- The i7-9700F is more power efficient and generates less heat.
- The i7-9700F has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Compare Phenom II X3 720 vs i7-9700F specifications
Phenom II X3 720 vs i7-9700F Architecture
|
Phenom II X3 720 |
i7-9700F |
| Codename | Heka | Coffee Lake |
| Generation | Phenom II X3
(Heka) | Core i7
(Coffee Lake Refresh) |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR3 | DDR4 |
| Part# | HDX720WFK3DGIHDX720WFGIBOX | unknown |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Released | Jan 2010 | Apr 2019 |
Phenom II X3 720 vs i7-9700F Cache
|
Phenom II X3 720 |
i7-9700F |
| Cache L1 | 128K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 512K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Cache L3 | 6MB (shared) | 12MB (shared) |
Phenom II X3 720 vs i7-9700F Cores
|
Phenom II X3 720 |
i7-9700F |
| # of Cores | 3 | 8 |
| # of Threads | 3 | 8 |
| Integrated Graphics | N/A | N/A |
| SMP # CPUs | 1 | 1 |
Phenom II X3 720 vs i7-9700F Features
|
Phenom II X3 720 |
i7-9700F |
Phenom II X3 720 vs i7-9700F Performance
|
Phenom II X3 720 |
i7-9700F |
| Base Clock | 200 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Frequency | 2.8 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Multiplier | 14.0x | 30.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |
| TDP | 95 W | 65 W |
| Turbo Clock | N/A | up to 4.7 GHz |
| Voltage | 1.425 V | unknown |
Phenom II X3 720 vs i7-9700F Physical
|
Phenom II X3 720 |
i7-9700F |
| Die Size | 258 mm² | unknown |
| Package | µPGA | FC-LGA14C |
| Process Size | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Socket | AMD Socket AM3 | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Transistors | 758 million | unknown |
| tCaseMax | unknown | 72°C |
Compare Phenom II X3 720 vs i7-9700F in more games
What to Consider Before Buying a Graphics Card
If you have been planning to upgrade your system by purchasing a new graphics card. Then there are some important factors to consider.
Resolution VS Quality: Impact on Game Performance
What affects game performance? Clarity or Details?
Ultra VS High Quality Settings in PC Games
Every player has a different notion about the ideal setting for PC games. But in most cases, opting for a High quality graphics configuration is the way to go.
What are CPU or GPU Bottlenecks?
Are you getting sudden frame drops? you might have a bottleneck.
What is the acceptable FPS speed for me?
For some games, you can still enjoy great garphics at lower frame rates.
GPU Hierarchy
GPU Compare
CPU Compare
Gaming Laptops
Gaming Monitors
Gaming Headsets
Discussion and Comments
Share Your Comments