i9-13900K vs i3-12300 - Doom RX 6600M - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-13900K i3-12300

Multi-Thread Performance

34549 Pts
14493 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

4683 Pts
3550 Pts

Doom

i9-13900K vs i3-12300 in Doom using RX 6600M - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-13900K i3-12300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
190.0 FPS
1080p
168.1 FPS
1440p
133.7 FPS
1440p
123.9 FPS
2160p
69.4 FPS
2160p
64.3 FPS
w1440p
108.7 FPS
w1440p
100.7 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
268.9 FPS
1080p
243.0 FPS
1440p
201.0 FPS
1440p
188.6 FPS
2160p
115.7 FPS
2160p
108.4 FPS
w1440p
169.0 FPS
w1440p
158.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
347.8 FPS
1080p
318.0 FPS
1440p
268.2 FPS
1440p
253.3 FPS
2160p
162.0 FPS
2160p
152.5 FPS
w1440p
229.3 FPS
w1440p
216.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
505.5 FPS
1080p
467.9 FPS
1440p
402.7 FPS
1440p
382.6 FPS
2160p
254.6 FPS
2160p
240.8 FPS
w1440p
349.9 FPS
w1440p
331.9 FPS
i9-13900K
  • The i9-13900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i9-13900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-13900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-13900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
i3-12300
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i9-13900K vs i3-12300 specifications

i9-13900K vs i3-12300 Architecture

i9-13900K i3-12300
ChipsetsZ690, Z790Z690, H670, B660, H610
CodenameRaptor Lake-SAlder Lake-S
DDR4 Speed3200 MT/s3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed5600 MT/s4800 MT/s
ECC MemoryYesNo
GenerationCore i9 (Raptor Lake)Core i3 (Alder Lake-S)
Launch MSRP$589$143
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
PCI-ExpressGen 5, 20 Lanes(CPU only)Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only)
Part#SRMBHSRL61
Production StatusActiveActive
Release DateSep 27th, 2022Jan 2022

i9-13900K vs i3-12300 Cache

i9-13900K i3-12300
Cache L180K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L22MB (per core)1.25MB (per core)
Cache L336MB (shared)12MB (shared)

i9-13900K vs i3-12300 Cores

i9-13900K i3-12300
# of Cores244
# of Threads328
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770UHD Graphics 730
SMP # CPUs11

i9-13900K vs i3-12300 Performance

i9-13900K i3-12300
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier30.0x35.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
PL1253 W60W
PL2253 W89W
PL2 Tau LimitUnlimited28 seconds
TDP125 W60 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.8 GHzup to 4.4 GHz

i9-13900K vs i3-12300 Physical

i9-13900K i3-12300
Die Size257 mm²163 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA16A
Process Size10 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1700
tJMax100°C100°C

Compare i9-13900K vs i3-12300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments