i5-11600K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core - Doom Graphics 448SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-11600K FX-8320 Eight-Core

Multi-Thread Performance

14700 Pts
8017 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2992 Pts
1397 Pts

Doom

i5-11600K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core in Doom using Graphics 448SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-11600K FX-8320 Eight-Core

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
161.8 FPS
1080p
92.5 FPS
1440p
119.3 FPS
1440p
68.2 FPS
2160p
61.9 FPS
2160p
35.4 FPS
w1440p
96.9 FPS
w1440p
55.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
235.5 FPS
1080p
147.6 FPS
1440p
182.7 FPS
1440p
114.0 FPS
2160p
105.0 FPS
2160p
65.0 FPS
w1440p
153.4 FPS
w1440p
95.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
309.2 FPS
1080p
202.6 FPS
1440p
246.1 FPS
1440p
159.8 FPS
2160p
148.0 FPS
2160p
94.5 FPS
w1440p
210.0 FPS
w1440p
135.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
456.5 FPS
1080p
312.7 FPS
1440p
372.9 FPS
1440p
251.3 FPS
2160p
234.1 FPS
2160p
153.7 FPS
w1440p
323.1 FPS
w1440p
215.7 FPS
i5-11600K
    FX-8320 Eight-Core

      Compare i5-11600K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core specifications

      i5-11600K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Architecture

      i5-11600K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i5-11600K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Cache

      i5-11600K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i5-11600K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Cores

      i5-11600K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i5-11600K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Features

      i5-11600K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i5-11600K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Notes

      i5-11600K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i5-11600K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Performance

      i5-11600K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i5-11600K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Physical

      i5-11600K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      Compare i5-11600K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core in more games


      Discussion and Comments

      Share Your Comments