i5-11600K vs FX-8300 Eight-Core - Doom GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-11600K FX-8300 Eight-Core

Multi-Thread Performance

14700 Pts
7716 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2992 Pts
1403 Pts

Doom

i5-11600K vs FX-8300 Eight-Core in Doom using GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-11600K FX-8300 Eight-Core

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
112.0 FPS
1080p
62.7 FPS
1440p
78.5 FPS
1440p
44.6 FPS
2160p
41.7 FPS
2160p
23.7 FPS
w1440p
64.3 FPS
w1440p
36.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
173.3 FPS
1080p
106.1 FPS
1440p
128.4 FPS
1440p
79.3 FPS
2160p
74.8 FPS
2160p
45.9 FPS
w1440p
108.4 FPS
w1440p
66.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
234.6 FPS
1080p
149.5 FPS
1440p
178.4 FPS
1440p
114.0 FPS
2160p
107.9 FPS
2160p
68.0 FPS
w1440p
152.5 FPS
w1440p
97.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
357.2 FPS
1080p
236.3 FPS
1440p
278.3 FPS
1440p
183.3 FPS
2160p
174.2 FPS
2160p
112.4 FPS
w1440p
240.8 FPS
w1440p
157.7 FPS
i5-11600K
    FX-8300 Eight-Core

      Compare i5-11600K vs FX-8300 Eight-Core specifications

      i5-11600K vs FX-8300 Eight-Core Architecture

      i5-11600K FX-8300 Eight-Core

      i5-11600K vs FX-8300 Eight-Core Cache

      i5-11600K FX-8300 Eight-Core

      i5-11600K vs FX-8300 Eight-Core Cores

      i5-11600K FX-8300 Eight-Core

      i5-11600K vs FX-8300 Eight-Core Features

      i5-11600K FX-8300 Eight-Core

      i5-11600K vs FX-8300 Eight-Core Notes

      i5-11600K FX-8300 Eight-Core

      i5-11600K vs FX-8300 Eight-Core Performance

      i5-11600K FX-8300 Eight-Core

      i5-11600K vs FX-8300 Eight-Core Physical

      i5-11600K FX-8300 Eight-Core

      Compare i5-11600K vs FX-8300 Eight-Core in more games


      Discussion and Comments

      Share Your Comments