i3-7320 vs i9-13900K - Doom Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-7320 i9-13900K

Multi-Thread Performance

6541 Pts
34549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2364 Pts
4683 Pts

Doom

i3-7320 vs i9-13900K in Doom using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-7320 i9-13900K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
99.2 FPS
1080p
140.6 FPS
1440p
72.0 FPS
1440p
97.4 FPS
2160p
37.2 FPS
2160p
50.4 FPS
w1440p
58.4 FPS
w1440p
79.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
156.5 FPS
1080p
209.6 FPS
1440p
119.4 FPS
1440p
154.1 FPS
2160p
67.8 FPS
2160p
88.0 FPS
w1440p
99.9 FPS
w1440p
129.1 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
213.8 FPS
1080p
278.5 FPS
1440p
166.7 FPS
1440p
210.8 FPS
2160p
98.4 FPS
2160p
125.7 FPS
w1440p
141.3 FPS
w1440p
179.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
328.4 FPS
1080p
416.4 FPS
1440p
261.4 FPS
1440p
324.2 FPS
2160p
159.6 FPS
2160p
201.0 FPS
w1440p
224.3 FPS
w1440p
279.5 FPS
i3-7320
  • The i3-7320 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-7320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i9-13900K
  • The i9-13900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-13900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-13900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i9-13900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i3-7320 vs i9-13900K specifications

i3-7320 vs i9-13900K Architecture

i3-7320 i9-13900K
CodenameKaby LakeRaptor Lake-S
GenerationCore i3 (Kaby Lake)Core i9 (Raptor Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Part#SR358SRMBH
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-7320 vs i9-13900K Cache

i3-7320 i9-13900K
Cache L164K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)2MB (per core)
Cache L34MB (shared)36MB (shared)

i3-7320 vs i9-13900K Cores

i3-7320 i9-13900K
# of Cores224
# of Threads432
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD 630UHD Graphics 770
SMP # CPUs11

i3-7320 vs i9-13900K Features

i3-7320 i9-13900K

i3-7320 vs i9-13900K Performance

i3-7320 i9-13900K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency4.1 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier41.0x30.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP51 W125 W
Turbo ClockN/Aup to 5.8 GHz

i3-7320 vs i9-13900K Physical

i3-7320 i9-13900K
Die Sizeunknown257 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1700
tCaseMax65°C72°C

Compare i3-7320 vs i9-13900K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments