i3-12300 vs i3-7300 - Doom Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 i3-7300

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
6436 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
2317 Pts

Doom

i3-12300 vs i3-7300 in Doom using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 i3-7300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
96.1 FPS
1080p
75.5 FPS
1440p
70.8 FPS
1440p
55.7 FPS
2160p
36.7 FPS
2160p
28.9 FPS
w1440p
57.5 FPS
w1440p
45.2 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
152.4 FPS
1080p
124.3 FPS
1440p
117.7 FPS
1440p
95.9 FPS
2160p
67.0 FPS
2160p
54.5 FPS
w1440p
98.6 FPS
w1440p
80.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
208.7 FPS
1080p
173.0 FPS
1440p
164.5 FPS
1440p
136.1 FPS
2160p
97.3 FPS
2160p
80.1 FPS
w1440p
139.6 FPS
w1440p
115.2 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
321.2 FPS
1080p
270.6 FPS
1440p
258.3 FPS
1440p
216.5 FPS
2160p
158.0 FPS
2160p
131.3 FPS
w1440p
221.7 FPS
w1440p
185.2 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12300 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12300 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i3-12300 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-7300
  • The i3-7300 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-7300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-7300 specifications

i3-12300 vs i3-7300 Architecture

i3-12300 i3-7300
CodenameAlder Lake-SKaby Lake
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i3 (Kaby Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRL61SR359
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-12300 vs i3-7300 Cache

i3-12300 i3-7300
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)4MB (shared)

i3-12300 vs i3-7300 Cores

i3-12300 i3-7300
# of Cores42
# of Threads84
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730Intel HD 630
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12300 vs i3-7300 Performance

i3-12300 i3-7300
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz4 GHz
Multiplier35.0x40.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W51 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzN/A

i3-12300 vs i3-7300 Physical

i3-12300 i3-7300
Die Size163 mm²unknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA1151
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1151

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-7300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments