i3-12300 vs Phenom II X2 550 - Doom GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 Phenom II X2 550

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
2021 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
1066 Pts

Doom

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X2 550 in Doom using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 Phenom II X2 550

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
87.2 FPS
1080p
35.7 FPS
1440p
61.2 FPS
1440p
25.1 FPS
2160p
31.6 FPS
2160p
12.9 FPS
w1440p
49.6 FPS
w1440p
20.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
140.4 FPS
1080p
65.4 FPS
1440p
103.9 FPS
1440p
48.2 FPS
2160p
58.9 FPS
2160p
26.9 FPS
w1440p
86.8 FPS
w1440p
40.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
193.6 FPS
1080p
95.2 FPS
1440p
146.7 FPS
1440p
71.3 FPS
2160p
86.2 FPS
2160p
41.0 FPS
w1440p
124.1 FPS
w1440p
60.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
299.9 FPS
1080p
154.7 FPS
1440p
232.2 FPS
1440p
117.6 FPS
2160p
140.8 FPS
2160p
69.0 FPS
w1440p
198.6 FPS
w1440p
99.8 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12300 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12300 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12300 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Phenom II X2 550
  • The Phenom II X2 550 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM

Compare i3-12300 vs Phenom II X2 550 specifications

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X2 550 Architecture

i3-12300 Phenom II X2 550
CodenameAlder Lake-SCallisto
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Phenom II X2 (Callisto)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRL61HDX550WFK2DGMHDX550WFGMBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X2 550 Cache

i3-12300 Phenom II X2 550
Cache L180K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)6MB (shared)

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X2 550 Cores

i3-12300 Phenom II X2 550
# of Cores42
# of Threads82
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X2 550 Performance

i3-12300 Phenom II X2 550
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz3.1 GHz
Multiplier35.0x15.5x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W80 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzN/A

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X2 550 Physical

i3-12300 Phenom II X2 550
Die Size163 mm²258 mm²
PackageFC-LGA16AµPGA
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM3

Compare i3-12300 vs Phenom II X2 550 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments