i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 245 - Doom Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 Athlon II X2 245

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
1662 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
951 Pts

Doom

i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 245 in Doom using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 Athlon II X2 245

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
123.2 FPS
1080p
47.2 FPS
1440p
89.4 FPS
1440p
34.2 FPS
2160p
46.3 FPS
2160p
17.7 FPS
w1440p
72.6 FPS
w1440p
27.8 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
187.7 FPS
1080p
83.2 FPS
1440p
143.4 FPS
1440p
63.1 FPS
2160p
81.9 FPS
2160p
35.6 FPS
w1440p
120.2 FPS
w1440p
52.7 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
252.2 FPS
1080p
119.3 FPS
1440p
197.3 FPS
1440p
91.9 FPS
2160p
117.4 FPS
2160p
53.4 FPS
w1440p
167.8 FPS
w1440p
77.6 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
381.2 FPS
1080p
191.3 FPS
1440p
305.3 FPS
1440p
149.6 FPS
2160p
188.6 FPS
2160p
89.1 FPS
w1440p
263.0 FPS
w1440p
127.4 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12100 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X2 245
  • The Athlon II X2 245 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM

Compare i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 245 specifications

i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 245 Architecture

i3-12100 Athlon II X2 245
CodenameAlder Lake-SRegor
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Athlon II X2 (Regor)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRL62ADX245OCK23GQ
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 245 Cache

i3-12100 Athlon II X2 245
Cache L180K (per core)256K
Cache L21.25MB (per core)2MB

i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 245 Cores

i3-12100 Athlon II X2 245
# of Cores42
# of Threads82
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 245 Performance

i3-12100 Athlon II X2 245
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.3 GHz2.9 GHz
Multiplier33.0x14.5x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzN/A

i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 245 Physical

i3-12100 Athlon II X2 245
Die Size163 mm²117 mm²
PackageFC-LGA16AµPGA
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM3

Compare i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 245 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments