i3-10100 vs i3-3240 - Doom GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-10100 i3-3240

Multi-Thread Performance

9549 Pts
4310 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2531 Pts
1808 Pts

Doom

i3-10100 vs i3-3240 in Doom using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-10100 i3-3240

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
82.2 FPS
1080p
42.1 FPS
1440p
57.7 FPS
1440p
29.6 FPS
2160p
29.8 FPS
2160p
15.3 FPS
w1440p
46.8 FPS
w1440p
24.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
133.5 FPS
1080p
75.4 FPS
1440p
98.8 FPS
1440p
55.6 FPS
2160p
56.0 FPS
2160p
31.3 FPS
w1440p
82.6 FPS
w1440p
46.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
184.9 FPS
1080p
108.8 FPS
1440p
140.0 FPS
1440p
81.7 FPS
2160p
82.1 FPS
2160p
47.3 FPS
w1440p
118.4 FPS
w1440p
68.8 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
287.6 FPS
1080p
175.5 FPS
1440p
222.3 FPS
1440p
133.8 FPS
2160p
134.5 FPS
2160p
79.3 FPS
w1440p
190.1 FPS
w1440p
113.5 FPS
i3-10100
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
i3-3240
  • The i3-3240 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i3-10100 vs i3-3240 specifications

i3-10100 vs i3-3240

i3-10100 i3-3240

i3-10100 vs i3-3240 Compatibility

i3-10100 i3-3240

i3-10100 vs i3-3240 General

i3-10100 i3-3240

i3-10100 vs i3-3240 Integrated Graphics

i3-10100 i3-3240

i3-10100 vs i3-3240 Memory Specs

i3-10100 i3-3240

i3-10100 vs i3-3240 Performance

i3-10100 i3-3240
Frequency3.60 GHz3.4 GHz
TDP65 W55 W

i3-10100 vs i3-3240 Technical Specs

i3-10100 i3-3240

i3-10100 vs i3-3240 Technologies and Extensions

i3-10100 i3-3240

i3-10100 vs i3-3240 Virtualization Technologies

i3-10100 i3-3240

Compare i3-10100 vs i3-3240 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments