i9-12900K vs i3-540 - Dead Space Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-12900K i3-540

Multi-Thread Performance

28791 Pts
2687 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3903 Pts
1224 Pts

Dead Space

i9-12900K vs i3-540 in Dead Space using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-12900K i3-540

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
38.0 FPS
1080p
9.9 FPS
1440p
24.8 FPS
1440p
6.6 FPS
2160p
9.9 FPS
2160p
2.6 FPS
w1440p
18.5 FPS
w1440p
5.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
69.1 FPS
1080p
21.3 FPS
1440p
47.7 FPS
1440p
14.9 FPS
2160p
21.3 FPS
2160p
6.5 FPS
w1440p
37.0 FPS
w1440p
11.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
100.1 FPS
1080p
32.7 FPS
1440p
70.6 FPS
1440p
23.2 FPS
2160p
32.7 FPS
2160p
10.3 FPS
w1440p
55.4 FPS
w1440p
18.2 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
162.3 FPS
1080p
55.6 FPS
1440p
116.5 FPS
1440p
39.7 FPS
2160p
55.6 FPS
2160p
18.1 FPS
w1440p
92.3 FPS
w1440p
31.5 FPS
i9-12900K
  • The i9-12900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-12900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-12900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-12900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-540
  • The i3-540 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i3-540 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i9-12900K vs i3-540 specifications

i9-12900K vs i3-540 Architecture

i9-12900K i3-540
CodenameAlder LakeClarkdale
GenerationCore i9 (Alder Lake-S)Core i3 (Clarkdale)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4-3200 MHz Dual-channelDDR3
Part#unknownSLBX7SLBLR
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i9-12900K vs i3-540 Cache

i9-12900K i3-540
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L214MB (shared)256K (per core)
Cache L330MB (shared)4MB (shared)

i9-12900K vs i3-540 Cores

i9-12900K i3-540
# of Cores162
# of Threads244
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770Intel HD
SMP # CPUs11

i9-12900K vs i3-540 Performance

i9-12900K i3-540
Base Clock100 MHz133 MHz
Frequency3.2 GHz3.066 GHz
Multiplier32.0x23.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W73 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.2 GHzN/A

i9-12900K vs i3-540 Physical

i9-12900K i3-540
Die Sizeunknown81 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1700FC-LGA10
Process Size10 nm32 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1156
Transistorsunknown382 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i9-12900K vs i3-540 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments