i5-8600 vs i3-12300 - Dead Space GTX 1650 Ti Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-8600 i3-12300

Multi-Thread Performance

12552 Pts
14493 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2517 Pts
3550 Pts

Dead Space

i5-8600 vs i3-12300 in Dead Space using GTX 1650 Ti Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-8600 i3-12300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
26.8 FPS
1080p
27.6 FPS
1440p
17.9 FPS
1440p
18.4 FPS
2160p
7.2 FPS
2160p
7.4 FPS
w1440p
13.4 FPS
w1440p
13.8 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
51.0 FPS
1080p
52.4 FPS
1440p
35.9 FPS
1440p
36.8 FPS
2160p
16.1 FPS
2160p
16.5 FPS
w1440p
27.8 FPS
w1440p
28.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
75.3 FPS
1080p
77.1 FPS
1440p
53.9 FPS
1440p
55.2 FPS
2160p
25.0 FPS
2160p
25.6 FPS
w1440p
42.3 FPS
w1440p
43.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
123.8 FPS
1080p
126.7 FPS
1440p
89.9 FPS
1440p
91.9 FPS
2160p
42.7 FPS
2160p
43.7 FPS
w1440p
71.2 FPS
w1440p
72.9 FPS
i5-8600
  • The i5-8600 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-8600 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-8600 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12300 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12300 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i5-8600 vs i3-12300 specifications

i5-8600 vs i3-12300 Architecture

i5-8600 i3-12300
CodenameCoffee LakeAlder Lake-S
GenerationCore i5 (Coffee Lake)Core i3 (Alder Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Part#SR3X0SRL61
Production StatusActiveActive

i5-8600 vs i3-12300 Cache

i5-8600 i3-12300
Cache L164K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)1.25MB (per core)
Cache L39MB (shared)12MB (shared)

i5-8600 vs i3-12300 Cores

i5-8600 i3-12300
# of Cores64
# of Threads68
Integrated GraphicsN/AUHD Graphics 730
SMP # CPUs11

i5-8600 vs i3-12300 Features

i5-8600 i3-12300

i5-8600 vs i3-12300 Performance

i5-8600 i3-12300
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.1 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier31.0x35.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W60 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzup to 4.4 GHz

i5-8600 vs i3-12300 Physical

i5-8600 i3-12300
Die Sizeunknown163 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1700

Compare i5-8600 vs i3-12300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments