i5-12400 vs i3-4370 - Dead Space Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-12400 i3-4370

Multi-Thread Performance

16800 Pts
5600 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3240 Pts
2220 Pts

Dead Space

i5-12400 vs i3-4370 in Dead Space using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-12400 i3-4370

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
28.5 FPS
1080p
16.7 FPS
1440p
19.1 FPS
1440p
11.2 FPS
2160p
7.6 FPS
2160p
4.5 FPS
w1440p
14.3 FPS
w1440p
8.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
53.8 FPS
1080p
33.8 FPS
1440p
38.0 FPS
1440p
23.8 FPS
2160p
16.9 FPS
2160p
10.6 FPS
w1440p
29.5 FPS
w1440p
18.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
79.2 FPS
1080p
50.9 FPS
1440p
56.9 FPS
1440p
36.4 FPS
2160p
26.1 FPS
2160p
16.7 FPS
w1440p
44.7 FPS
w1440p
28.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
129.9 FPS
1080p
85.0 FPS
1440p
94.7 FPS
1440p
61.5 FPS
2160p
44.7 FPS
2160p
28.8 FPS
w1440p
75.0 FPS
w1440p
48.5 FPS
i5-12400
  • The i5-12400 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-12400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-12400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i5-12400 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-4370
  • The i3-4370 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-4370 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i5-12400 vs i3-4370 specifications

i5-12400 vs i3-4370 Architecture

i5-12400 i3-4370
CodenameAlder Lake-SHaswell
GenerationCore i5 (Alder Lake-S)Core i3 (Haswell)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRL4V SRL5Yunknown
Production StatusActiveunknown

i5-12400 vs i3-4370 Cache

i5-12400 i3-4370
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L318MB (shared)4MB (shared)

i5-12400 vs i3-4370 Cores

i5-12400 i3-4370
# of Cores62
# of Threads124
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730Intel HD 4600
SMP # CPUs11

i5-12400 vs i3-4370 Performance

i5-12400 i3-4370
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency2.5 GHz3.8 GHz
Multiplier25.0x38.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W54 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzN/A

i5-12400 vs i3-4370 Physical

i5-12400 i3-4370
Die Size163 mm²177 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA12C
Process Size10 nm22 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1150

Compare i5-12400 vs i3-4370 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments