i5-12400 vs Athlon II X3 455 - Dead Space Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-12400 Athlon II X3 455

Multi-Thread Performance

16800 Pts
2768 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3240 Pts
1130 Pts

Dead Space

i5-12400 vs Athlon II X3 455 in Dead Space using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-12400 Athlon II X3 455

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
28.5 FPS
1080p
12.6 FPS
1440p
19.1 FPS
1440p
8.4 FPS
2160p
7.6 FPS
2160p
3.3 FPS
w1440p
14.3 FPS
w1440p
6.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
53.8 FPS
1080p
26.4 FPS
1440p
38.0 FPS
1440p
18.4 FPS
2160p
16.9 FPS
2160p
8.0 FPS
w1440p
29.5 FPS
w1440p
14.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
79.2 FPS
1080p
40.2 FPS
1440p
56.9 FPS
1440p
28.5 FPS
2160p
26.1 FPS
2160p
12.7 FPS
w1440p
44.7 FPS
w1440p
22.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
129.9 FPS
1080p
67.7 FPS
1440p
94.7 FPS
1440p
48.5 FPS
2160p
44.7 FPS
2160p
22.2 FPS
w1440p
75.0 FPS
w1440p
38.2 FPS
i5-12400
  • The i5-12400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-12400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i5-12400 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i5-12400 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X3 455
  • The Athlon II X3 455 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i5-12400 vs Athlon II X3 455 specifications

i5-12400 vs Athlon II X3 455 Architecture

i5-12400 Athlon II X3 455
CodenameAlder Lake-SRana
GenerationCore i5 (Alder Lake-S)Athlon II X3 (Rana)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRL4V SRL5YADX455WFK32GMADX455WFGMBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i5-12400 vs Athlon II X3 455 Cache

i5-12400 Athlon II X3 455
Cache L180K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)512K (per core)

i5-12400 vs Athlon II X3 455 Cores

i5-12400 Athlon II X3 455
# of Cores63
# of Threads123
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i5-12400 vs Athlon II X3 455 Performance

i5-12400 Athlon II X3 455
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency2.5 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplier25.0x16.5x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzN/A

i5-12400 vs Athlon II X3 455 Physical

i5-12400 Athlon II X3 455
Die Size163 mm²169 mm²
PackageFC-LGA16AµPGA
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM3

Compare i5-12400 vs Athlon II X3 455 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments