i3-9100 vs i3-7300 - Dead Space RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9100 i3-7300

Multi-Thread Performance

9095 Pts
6436 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2411 Pts
2317 Pts

Dead Space

i3-9100 vs i3-7300 in Dead Space using RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9100 i3-7300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
62.4 FPS
1080p
53.1 FPS
1440p
41.7 FPS
1440p
35.4 FPS
2160p
16.6 FPS
2160p
14.1 FPS
w1440p
31.2 FPS
w1440p
26.5 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
105.7 FPS
1080p
92.1 FPS
1440p
74.8 FPS
1440p
65.0 FPS
2160p
33.6 FPS
2160p
29.1 FPS
w1440p
58.2 FPS
w1440p
50.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
149.0 FPS
1080p
131.0 FPS
1440p
107.9 FPS
1440p
94.5 FPS
2160p
50.6 FPS
2160p
44.1 FPS
w1440p
85.3 FPS
w1440p
74.6 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
235.5 FPS
1080p
209.0 FPS
1440p
174.2 FPS
1440p
153.7 FPS
2160p
84.6 FPS
2160p
74.2 FPS
w1440p
139.4 FPS
w1440p
122.7 FPS
i3-9100
  • The i3-9100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-9100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-7300
  • The i3-7300 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i3-7300 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-7300 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-7300 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-9100 vs i3-7300 specifications

i3-9100 vs i3-7300 Architecture

i3-9100 i3-7300
CodenameCoffee LakeKaby Lake
GenerationCore i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Core i3 (Kaby Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#SR3XQSR359
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedSep 2018Jan 2017

i3-9100 vs i3-7300 Cache

i3-9100 i3-7300
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L36MB (shared)4MB (shared)

i3-9100 vs i3-7300 Cores

i3-9100 i3-7300
# of Cores42
# of Threads44
Integrated GraphicsN/AIntel HD 630
SMP # CPUs11

i3-9100 vs i3-7300 Performance

i3-9100 i3-7300
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz4 GHz
Multiplier37.0x40.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W51 W
Turbo ClockN/AN/A
Voltagevariableunknown

i3-9100 vs i3-7300 Physical

i3-9100 i3-7300
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA1151
Process Size14 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1151
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax72°C65°C

Compare i3-9100 vs i3-7300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments